Nationalize the credit bureaus
Take this power out of incompetent private hands
Equifax, the credit-reporting agency, has suffered one of the worst data breaches in history, with 143 million American citizens having their personal data stolen. Worse, Equifax executives reportedly sold a bunch of their company stock after they heard of the breach, but before it was released to the public. Then they followed up that potentially illegal act with perhaps the worst response to a corporate data breach in history, setting up a clearly nonfunctional site that attempted to trick people into signing away their right to a class-action lawsuit, and into signing up for a one-year trial of a credit oversight service that costs $20 per month after it expires.
It's time to nationalize the credit reporting industry — not just Equifax, but also the other two major credit bureaus: Experian and TransUnion. The power to adjudicate creditworthiness should not be in private hands.
On one level, Equifax's insouciant attitude likely reflects the rot and corruption among top federal prosecutors, law enforcement agencies, and regulators. Back in the day, this kind of thing — especially the probable insider trading — would raise fears of prosecution and jail time. But as Jesse Eisinger's excellent new book The Chickenshit Club details, hardly anyone is successfully prosecuted for white-collar crime these days. Modern prosecutors and regulators largely don't know how to pursue these cases, or actively sympathize with the criminals, or fear being blackballed from future high-paying private sector gigs; meanwhile neoliberal hack judges have sharply raised the legal bar for such prosecutions, making it harder still.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
But on a deeper level, this kind of abuse and negligence is just to be expected from a private credit score system. These companies conduct non-consensual surveillance, and use a proprietary algorithm to judge people's creditworthiness. There is no transparency about their methodology, and they have little incentive to get things right. Even after some reforms strengthening Consumer Financial Protection Bureau oversight, the companies are not legally liable for errors. As a result, even aside from this jaw-dropping security breach, they screw up constantly. A 2012 Federal Trade Commission study found that one in five people had a mistake on at least one of their three credit reports, and one in 20 had an error that harmed their credit. Nearly a quarter of over 186,000 complaints to the CFPB in 2016 were about credit report mistakes — the largest category of complaint, and divided up fairly equally among the big three agencies.
Naturally, Republicans want to further insulate them from the consequences of their mistakes. As David Dayen writes:
Despite the manifest unreliability of the credit score system, it has still become a keystone part of daily life. To get a home loan, or a car loan, or rent out a new place, you typically need at least decent credit. But increasingly, employers use credit reports to vet new employees. There is no sign that this latter practice is conducted with some sort of rational justification or careful study; it's merely just one more way that employers can dominate and control their workforce — and for (disproportionately black and brown) low-class people to get trapped in an endless cycle of debt, bad credit, and bad jobs.
It is understandable for lenders to want to know someone's payment history before deciding on giving a loan. But it is unacceptable that the power to make such judgments reside in unaccountable private hands — especially when they are clearly incapable of avoiding grotesque errors.
Therefore, all three of the credit-reporting companies should be nationalized, and their data and algorithms folded into a government credit data system. Obviously people's personal data would remain under lock and key — which the government is eminently capable of doing, as evidenced by the IRS managing hundreds of millions of highly private tax returns every year. But credit-scoring methods would be made completely public, so people could know for sure how to get a good score — and researchers could examine whether the score is actually an accurate judge of creditworthiness. More importantly, citizens would be able to dispute any mistakes directly with an agency that is accountable to the public and their representatives, instead of going through the janky and unreliable process the agencies have now. Many European countries have a similar system, and it works just fine.
No doubt a public credit bureau would make its share of mistakes. But it's impossible to imagine them doing worse than the current private oligopoly. If people's lives are to be so heavily influenced by credit scores, then let that score be under the supervision of democratic institutions.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Ryan Cooper is a national correspondent at TheWeek.com. His work has appeared in the Washington Monthly, The New Republic, and the Washington Post.
-
Trump declares 'golden age' at indoor inauguration
In the Spotlight Donald Trump has been inaugurated as the 47th president of the United States
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
Where in the world to hop on a hot air balloon
The Week Recommends Float above California vineyards, Swiss Alps and the plains of the Serengeti
By Catherine Garcia, The Week US Published
-
'The death and destruction happening in Gaza still dominate our lives'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
US election: who the billionaires are backing
The Explainer More have endorsed Kamala Harris than Donald Trump, but among the 'ultra-rich' the split is more even
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
1 of 6 'Trump Train' drivers liable in Biden bus blockade
Speed Read Only one of the accused was found liable in the case concerning the deliberate slowing of a 2020 Biden campaign bus
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published