Nancy Pelosi was right about ObamaCare. So was Ted Cruz.
With another government shutdown looming, it's worth revisiting the lessons of the last one


With another government shutdown looming, it's worth revisiting the last one.
Recall, in 2013, when Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) damned the torpedoes in a misbegotten, but ultimately harmless, effort to defund ObamaCare. Everyone knew how it would end: The public would blame Republicans, who would subsequently capitulate, and the implementation of the Affordable Care Act would continue apace.
So let it be stipulated: The Cruz-engineered shutdown was tactically dumb.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
But was he wrong on substance? Not really.
In a July 2013 speech at the Western Conservative Summit, the Texan warned: "On Jan. 1, the exchanges kick in and the subsidies kick in. Once those kick in, it's going to prove almost impossible to undo ObamaCare. The administration's plan is very simple: Get everyone addicted to the sugar so that ObamaCare remains a permanent feature of our society."
Set aside Cruz's tendentious characterization of ACA premium support as "sugar." Wasn't he right that ObamaCare — that is, a financial commitment by the federal government to ensure broad access to health insurance — would become a "permanent feature of our society" if it were implemented?
President Trump and the GOP Congress just spent the better part of 2017 falling all over themselves trying to repeal and replace — or skinnily repeal and sorta replace at a later date — ObamaCare. They failed spectacularly. The reason they failed was simple: The idea of taking away health coverage, or money people use to buy health coverage, is enormously unpopular!
Ted Cruz was right. Once Americans get hooked on a benefit, it is all but impossible to take that benefit away.
Which prompts us to recall another lawmaker who was proved right about ObamaCare: Nancy Pelosi. Google the words "Pelosi" and "ObamaCare." You'll find all manner of contemporaneous commentary about the then-House speaker's remark that "we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it." At the time — 2010; lordy, how long ago it seems — the conservative infotainment complex pounced on Pelosi's words as an unintentional confession that she and other Democrats were unfamiliar with the contents of the Affordable Care Act. In context, however, it was clear Pelosi was saying that voters were being subjected to misinformation about the bill — and that they would like it once the partisan dust settled. She was saying that — follow me out on a limb here — voters would like ObamaCare once the "sugar" kicked in.
Shocking as it may seem, Pelosi and Cruz were singing different versions of the same song: Most people will conclude that they do in fact like sugar — and they won't take kindly to attempts to take it away. By April of this year, ObamaCare found favor with a majority of Americans for the first time in its existence, according to Gallup. Indeed, the law is more popular than the president, the vice president, the media, and both major parties.
None of this is to say there aren't real problems with ObamaCare, or that it's no longer under threat legislatively or administratively. There are. And it is. But despite this uncertainty, I predict that ObamaCare, in one form or another, is here to stay — just like a San Francisco liberal and a Texan right-winger told us.
Who says bipartisanship is dead?
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Scott Galupo is a freelance writer living in Virginia. In addition to The Week, he blogs for U.S. News and reviews live music for The Washington Post. He was formerly a senior contributor to the American Conservative and staff writer for The Washington Times. He was also an aide to Rep. John Boehner. He lives with his wife and two children and writes about politics to support his guitar habit.
-
Elon Musk departs the White House | June 6 editorial cartoons
Cartoons Friday's political cartoons include Elon Musk's departure from the White House, Democrats learning how to speak in word salads, an Donald Trump's chaotic birthday parade
-
The Torridon: a luxury retreat nestled amid Highland splendour
The Week Recommends Deep in Scotland's mountainous northwest, this boutique hotel is a stirring contrast between five-star elegance and rugged natural grandeur
-
'Arise, Sir Goldenballs': David Beckham plays the long game in quest for knighthood
Talking Point Former footballer set to be knighted in King's birthday honours after years of snubs
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy