Opinion

Sacrificed for the right of revolution

The NRA thinks AR-15s must remain legal so righteous Americans can overthrow the government

This is the editor's letter in the current issue of The Week magazine.

When Nikolas Cruz decided to turn his former high school into a slaughterhouse, he went to the Sunrise Tactical Supply store in a Parkland strip mall, put down $1,000 in cash, and pointed to an AR-15. He could have chosen a different semiautomatic rifle, or a handgun, or a knife, but he wanted a weapon designed for war. It was the same choice made by the Las Vegas shooter (who shot more than 400 people in 10 minutes), the Sutherland Springs shooter, the Newtown shooter, and so many others. A civilian knockoff of a weapon designed for battlefields, AR-15–style rifles are the perfect tools for mass killings — easy even for a novice Rambo to fire accurately, with little recoil, and customizable with handgrips, sights, and magazines of 30 to 100 rounds. For 10 years, the federal government banned assault-style weapons and large-capacity magazines, but that law expired in 2004. Now the NRA and its allies fiercely oppose any renewal of the ban. Why?

You'll hear various disingenuous arguments, but in The​ Federalist​ this week, John Davidson provides the answer that is the bedrock of all gun-control opposition. The Second Amendment, Davidson says, was not meant to merely protect hunting and self-defense. No: "The right to bear arms stems from the right of revolution." Weapons designed for war must remain legal, Davidson says, so that Americans can "overthrow their government if it becomes tyrannical." It's a terrible shame, he concedes, that AR-15s have been used to shoot up schools, concerts, workplaces, and churches — but the Second Amendment "is worth dying for." Seen from this perspective, the bullet-riddled dead of Parkland, Newtown, Las Vegas, et al. are necessary sacrifices; their slaughter enables liberty-loving Americans to maintain the option of armed rebellion. This core belief, which drives the intractable opposition to any form of gun control, is not often publicly discussed; until it's addressed and confronted, the carnage will continue.

More From...

Picture of William FalkWilliam Falk
Read All
Facebook's amoral algorithms
Mark Zuckerberg.
Opinion

Facebook's amoral algorithms

Why Denmark beat COVID and the U.S. didn't
An ambulance.
Opinion

Why Denmark beat COVID and the U.S. didn't

The limits of power
Soldiers.
Opinion

The limits of power

How fiascos happen
President Biden.
Opinion

How fiascos happen

Recommended

Ex-spy Christopher Steele stands behind the thrust of his Trump-Russia dossier
Christopher Steele
Speed Reads

Ex-spy Christopher Steele stands behind the thrust of his Trump-Russia dossier

House Democrats Mike Doyle and David Price announce retirements
Rep. David Price.
time to say goodbye

House Democrats Mike Doyle and David Price announce retirements

California had its driest year since 1924
Dry cracked land in California.
climate change

California had its driest year since 1924

Trump sues to block House committee from receiving Jan. 6 documents
Donald Trump.
capitol riot aftermath

Trump sues to block House committee from receiving Jan. 6 documents

Most Popular

Sicilian Catholic diocese bans godparents
Baptism at Vatican
'It's an experiment'

Sicilian Catholic diocese bans godparents

Halloween Kills scores best pandemic debut for a horror film
Halloween Kills
purely and simply evil

Halloween Kills scores best pandemic debut for a horror film

The American 'Great Resignation' by the numbers
Help wanted sign
Help Wanted

The American 'Great Resignation' by the numbers