Opinion

Sacrificed for the right of revolution

The NRA thinks AR-15s must remain legal so righteous Americans can overthrow the government

This is the editor's letter in the current issue of The Week magazine.

When Nikolas Cruz decided to turn his former high school into a slaughterhouse, he went to the Sunrise Tactical Supply store in a Parkland strip mall, put down $1,000 in cash, and pointed to an AR-15. He could have chosen a different semiautomatic rifle, or a handgun, or a knife, but he wanted a weapon designed for war. It was the same choice made by the Las Vegas shooter (who shot more than 400 people in 10 minutes), the Sutherland Springs shooter, the Newtown shooter, and so many others. A civilian knockoff of a weapon designed for battlefields, AR-15–style rifles are the perfect tools for mass killings — easy even for a novice Rambo to fire accurately, with little recoil, and customizable with handgrips, sights, and magazines of 30 to 100 rounds. For 10 years, the federal government banned assault-style weapons and large-capacity magazines, but that law expired in 2004. Now the NRA and its allies fiercely oppose any renewal of the ban. Why?

You'll hear various disingenuous arguments, but in The​ Federalist​ this week, John Davidson provides the answer that is the bedrock of all gun-control opposition. The Second Amendment, Davidson says, was not meant to merely protect hunting and self-defense. No: "The right to bear arms stems from the right of revolution." Weapons designed for war must remain legal, Davidson says, so that Americans can "overthrow their government if it becomes tyrannical." It's a terrible shame, he concedes, that AR-15s have been used to shoot up schools, concerts, workplaces, and churches — but the Second Amendment "is worth dying for." Seen from this perspective, the bullet-riddled dead of Parkland, Newtown, Las Vegas, et al. are necessary sacrifices; their slaughter enables liberty-loving Americans to maintain the option of armed rebellion. This core belief, which drives the intractable opposition to any form of gun control, is not often publicly discussed; until it's addressed and confronted, the carnage will continue.

More From...

Picture of William FalkWilliam Falk
Read All
Ignoring the evidence
Man in front of screen.
Editor's letter

Ignoring the evidence

Succumbing to Putin's blackmail
Ukrainian citizens.
Editor's letter

Succumbing to Putin's blackmail

Sky junk, not flying saucers
Scott Bray explains a video of an unidentified aerial phenomena.
Editor's letter

Sky junk, not flying saucers

What reforms can't fix
Police car.
Editor's letter

What reforms can't fix

Recommended

Fox News seeks gag order for producer claiming coercion in Dominion deposition
Maria Bartiromo interviews Rudy Giuliani in 2019
Dominion v. Fox News

Fox News seeks gag order for producer claiming coercion in Dominion deposition

What climate change means for California
California.
Briefing

What climate change means for California

The train derailment disaster in Ohio
Black smoke above East Palestine, Ohio.
Briefing

The train derailment disaster in Ohio

6 more Oath Keepers, associates convicted in militia's 3rd Jan. 6 trial
Courthouse in D.C. where Oath Keepers tried
Jan. 6 trials

6 more Oath Keepers, associates convicted in militia's 3rd Jan. 6 trial

Most Popular

The truth about alcohol
Alcohol being poured into a rocks glass.
Briefing

The truth about alcohol

North Korea claims 800,000 people volunteered to fight against the U.S.
North Korean soldiers march in a parade in 2018.
A Frightening Figure

North Korea claims 800,000 people volunteered to fight against the U.S.

Russia's spring Ukraine offensive may be winding down amid heavy losses
Ukrainian tank fires near Bakhmut
Attrition

Russia's spring Ukraine offensive may be winding down amid heavy losses