A fool and his trade war
President Trump's new tariffs are stupid. But are they disastrously stupid?
President Trump is finally getting his trade war.
Back in March, Trump announced tariffs on all steel and aluminum imports. But just as quickly, he granted exemptions to Canada, Mexico, and the European Union, among others. The hope was some sort of arrangement could be reached in the interim. But it wasn't to be. On Thursday, Trump slapped a 25 percent tariff on steel imports from Canada, Mexico, and the European Union, and a 10 percent tariff on their aluminum imports.
This is undoubtedly a dumb move. But is it a disastrously dumb move?
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Let's work through the problem, starting with Canada and Mexico. In their case, Trump's tariffs are a pretty obvious effort to push our two neighbors into seriously renegotiating the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The problem is Trump doesn't actually have any serious leverage here. He can't pull the U.S. out of NAFTA all by himself. He needs Congress to cooperate, and that cooperation will not be forthcoming. Neither Mexico nor Canada wants out of NAFTA, and Trump can't force their hand. Instead, they'll just respond with some retaliatory tariffs (as they already have) and call it a day.
Plenty of domestic American businesses rely on aluminum and steel imports — particularly from Canadian supply chains — and don't like it when their prices rise. As such, it will be hard for Trump to get any real political traction out of this.
The EU's trade entanglements with the U.S. are a good deal more complex. Trump's target here is America's $150 billion trade deficit with the EU, which he's called "unacceptable." And admittedly, the EU is not an innocent player here: It puts a 10 percent tariff on American cars, for instance, while Europe's own car exports to us face a duty of only 2.5 percent.
But the root cause of the trade deficit with the EU is that the euro trades for less value than the U.S. dollar. If Trump explicitly offered negotiations over eurozone currency policy as a way to settle the aluminum and steel tariffs, that would be one thing. But he's not. On top of that, a big part of why the euro is undervalued is that eurozone financial authorities keep imposing crippling austerity on countries like Greece and Italy, sabotaging the continent's economic recovery.
As for the steel and aluminum exports specifically, China is the real problem. Their massive dumping of steel exports is driving prices down all over the globe, which is why EU exports are undercutting American producers. In other words, America and the EU actually have a shared grievance here. But by lashing out at the Europeans with direct tariffs on them, Trump is making an alliance less likely.
Nor is anyone buying the Trump administration's argument that the steel and aluminum tariffs are necessary for national security. “We have not seen any analysis that shows these exports pose a problem to national security," said David O'Sullivan, the EU's ambassador in Washington. The Canadian foreign minister dismissed the argument as "frankly absurd."
Rather then intimidating anyone, Trump is mainly succeeding in insulting our allies.
The EU is responding to Trump's posturing with some Trump-like posturing of its own. The U.S. government wants countries to adopt voluntary quotas on steel and aluminum exports in exchange for scrapping the tariffs. And countries like South Korea, Australia, Brazil, and Argentina have already struck that deal. But EU leaders are holding their ground: "It pays to stand up to this administration," Edward Alden, senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, explained to The Washington Post. "I don't see Europe being willing to make big concessions to get trade peace."
The most likely result of Trump's tariffs will be little beyond a retaliatory set of EU tariffs on American exports (Kentucky bourbon, Levi's jeans, and Harley-Davidson motorcycles, among other things), plus a likely complaint to the World Trade Organization. But those imports from the EU also only total around $3 billion. Again, an unfortunate and needless trade skirmish, but also a small one in the grand scheme of things.
The danger lies in what Trump may do next.
Unable to bully the EU, Canada, or Mexico into submission, Trump may well retaliate to their retaliation. The administration is already discussing a 25 percent tariff an all automobiles imported from these countries. It would do it using the same national security reasoning as the steel and aluminum tariffs — which would be an even bigger stretch than the previous gambit. In fact, Trump is reportedly contemplating a total ban on all imports of German luxury cars.
This needless trade war could have major effects on Iran policy, too. Now that Trump has pulled America out of the nuclear deal, his next step will be to reimpose economic sanctions on Tehran. But for those sanctions to bite, they must also be imposed on any allies that do business with Iran. And since European Union nations didn't want to scuttle the Iran deal and are trying to save it, this could become a big problem. America exported $283 billion to the EU last year, and imported almost $435 billion. What happens when Europe keeps trading with Iran? If Trump sticks to his guns on Iran sanctions, it would be an escalation vastly worse than these steel tariffs, or even the threatened automobile tariffs.
As much as everyone (other than Trump, at least) wants to avoid a trade war, they often start much the same way normal wars start: not because people think hostilities would actually be a good idea, but just because no one wants to swallow their pride and back down from a fight. But please, Mr. President: Swallow your pride. Back down. These tariffs are stupid — and dangerous.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Jeff Spross was the economics and business correspondent at TheWeek.com. He was previously a reporter at ThinkProgress.
-
What the chancellor's pension megafund plans mean for your money
Rachel Reeves wants pension schemes to merge and back UK infrastructure – but is it putting your money at risk?
By Marc Shoffman, The Week UK Published
-
Why Māori are protesting in New Zealand
A controversial bill has ignited a 'flashpoint in race relations' as opponents claim it will undermine the rights of Indigenous people
By Richard Windsor, The Week UK Published
-
Crossword: November 21, 2024
The Week's daily crossword
By The Week Staff Published
-
US election: who the billionaires are backing
The Explainer More have endorsed Kamala Harris than Donald Trump, but among the 'ultra-rich' the split is more even
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
1 of 6 'Trump Train' drivers liable in Biden bus blockade
Speed Read Only one of the accused was found liable in the case concerning the deliberate slowing of a 2020 Biden campaign bus
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Biden, Trump urge calm after assassination attempt
Speed Reads A 20-year-old gunman grazed Trump's ear and fatally shot a rally attendee on Saturday
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published