Unleash the IRS
Tax dodging leads to right-wing extremism and cozy relationships with authoritarian regimes
Saudi Arabia may have finally cracked its reputation among the American elite, at least in part. While wealthy Silicon Valley liberals and the D.C. foreign policy "blob" don't particularly care when that country casually blows up a school bus full of children, it turns out they care quite a lot when it allegedly assassinates a Washington Post columnist — that is, someone rather like themselves. Thus elite journalists and Big Tech tycoons are dropping out of the so-called "Davos in the Desert" investment conference in Saudi Arabia.
However, there is one large exception: the financial elite. So far most of the big bankers are staying in. BlackRock's Larry Fink and Blackstone's Steve Schwartzman are still going to speak there, as well as Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin.
This is shameful. It's also a good occasion to recall one quick and easy way to take the American plutocracy down a peg or three: by enforcing existing tax law. It's highly, highly likely that many of the financial vampires heading to Saudi Arabia aren't paying what they owe. Staffing up the IRS with aggressive analysts and auditors and siccing them specifically on the top 1 percent is likely to cut income inequality substantially and rake in a tidy sum for Uncle Sam.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
A good indicator of the level of tax-dodging in this county can be found in the gargantuan New York Times story about how Trump built his initial wealth. It's a spectacular piece of reporting, worth reading carefully and in full. But in essence, Trump reportedly received at least $413 million from his father through a huge number of questionably-legal acts and several "instances of outright fraud," as the Times writes.
This story got little attention, because fresh Trump scandals (and other disasters) are constantly flushing the old scandals off the front page, providing a sort of protective effect. Whether it's his constant flagrant violation of the Emoluments Clause, his alleged hush money payments for adulterous affairs, his grotesque failure to rebuild Puerto Rico, his staggeringly corrupt Cabinet, or any of a dozen others stories, another scandal has reliably come along to distract the public from the last one.
So it's worth taking a step back to really internalize the Trump tax scandal, because it goes to the heart of how American government has been gradually undermined by corruption. Starting in the mid-20th century, the president's father, Fred Trump, built up a gigantic real estate empire, and being such a skinflint, spent almost none of the proceeds on himself. Instead, from nearly the moment they were born, Fred reportedly transferred huge sums of money to his children, by fair means and foul. He established trusts for his children and hired them directly in some instances. Some taxes were reportedly just straight-up not paid at all. In one particularly egregious case outlined by the Times, he reportedly set up his kids with a fake independent contractor service, which did nothing but pad existing service prices by 20-50 percent.
But probably the key tactic was real estate appraisals that reportedly drastically undervalued Fred's properties. When he was near death, the Trumps reportedly got bunk value estimates that meant they only had to pay gift or estate taxes on a fraction of the properties' worth. Ownership transferred, the children could reportedly then sell the properties at their real value and rake in massive free profits. Overall, the Times reporters estimate that the Trump parents transferred well over $1 billion to their children, which by rights should have incurred a roughly $550 million estate tax bill. Instead, they reportedly paid $52.2 million.
The remarkable thing about this was that the IRS reportedly cottoned onto many of the various alleged scams and forced the Trumps to pay up — but only a tiny fraction of the actual amount owed. In the case of a $17.1 million property claimed at just $2.9 million, an IRS auditor reportedly made them increase the value by ... $100,000. Even back when America was dramatically less corrupt than it is today, entitled rich jerks were constantly skating on egregious tax scams.
Donald Trump made his own attempts at real estate investing, but he was lousy at it and went bankrupt repeatedly. But he was a savant at getting media attention and used his inherited riches to carefully cultivate an image as a self-made businessman. From then he became a national celebrity, a reality TV star, and then president of the United States.
Can there be any doubt that if a couple of battalions of tax inspectors took a very hard look into the books of the American plutocracy, they would find a veritable tax avoidance rat king? A Bloomberg report several years ago detailed the blizzard of legal loopholes Sheldon Adelson was reportedly using to protect his gargantuan fortune from taxes. But what people sometimes forget is that using legal trickery to avoid tax is itself illegal. And with the IRS increasingly gutted, plutocrats are getting increasingly lazy. Just look at Paul Manafort's hamfisted tax fraud schemes! I would wager quite a lot that a dedicated IRS audit could find more than a few nickels for the U.S. Treasury in the Adelson couch cushions.
Republicans have steadily strangled the budget and workforce of the IRS, more-or-less explicitly because that powerfully enables right-wing politics. The more tax that wealthy donors can dodge, the more that is available for campaign contributions and wingnut welfare "think tanks." But the converse of that reality is that simply forcing the rich to pay taxes is a powerful engine of egalitarian politics. (Given all the recent Republican tax cuts, today that would require increasing statutory tax rates as well.) It's a safe bet that would also take a sizable bite out of the Saudi lobbying industry, as laundering foreign bribes is one of the most common tax crimes committed nowadays (witness, again, Paul Manafort).
Ultimately, if Donald Trump had been forced to follow the letter of the tax law back in the 1980s and '90s, it's highly likely he would not have been able to boost himself into the media stratosphere and would not be president today.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Ryan Cooper is a national correspondent at TheWeek.com. His work has appeared in the Washington Monthly, The New Republic, and the Washington Post.
-
Today's political cartoons - March 16, 2024
Cartoons Saturday's cartoons - pointed commentary, Haiti in trouble, and more
By The Week US Published
-
5 hilarious cartoons about the RNC's MAGA takeover
Cartoons Artists take on RNC funding, Lara Trump, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Trump's presidential run: a bad bet for Republicans?
Talking Point The GOP is taking a 'big gamble' on former president's 2024 White House bid
By The Week UK Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Xi-Biden meeting: what's in it for both leaders?
Today's Big Question Two superpowers seek to stabilise relations amid global turmoil but core issues of security, trade and Taiwan remain
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Will North Korea take advantage of Israel-Hamas conflict?
Today's Big Question Pyongyang's ties with Russia are 'growing and dangerous' amid reports it sent weapons to Gaza
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published