How Democrats should respond to these bomb scares
Politics doesn't have to be this violent or divisive


After explosive devices were mailed this week to several Democrats who President Trump frequently targets with his rank criticism, liberals will be tempted to call for louder protests or more public confrontations with Republican politicians during the closing weeks of the midterm elections. Trying to beat Trump at his own game would be satisfying in the short term, but it misses a greater opportunity in the long run to slow the national descent into conflict and madness.
The culture wars have been gradually and steadily escalating for years, even before Trump came into office. But the trend has now predictably accelerated under a president who is a disruptor and an instinctive divider. Democrats certainly don't have to look far for examples of Trump's attempts to stoke violence. Democratic congressional leaders Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi shared some examples in a joint statement Wednesday.
"Time and time again, the president has condoned physical violence and divided Americans with his words and his actions," they said. "Expressing support for the congressman who body-slammed a reporter, the neo-Nazis who killed a young woman in Charlottesville, his supporters at rallies who get violent with protestors, dictators around the world who murder their own citizens, and referring to the free press as the enemy of the people."
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Pointing out Trump's divisive rhetoric against political foes and attacks on the media certainly allows Democrats to pour water on the GOP's new slogan about Republicans creating jobs while Democrats create mobs. And this message might work. But Democrats could be well positioned if they ran on normalcy instead, stepping back from the chaos and confrontation that seems to dominate Trump's America. The president is tweeting angrily and constantly. There are allegations of near-fisticuffs in the West Wing. And now lunatics are taking the hatred that increasingly shapes our politics to the next level, from the congressional baseball practice field to the New York City offices of a cable news network. In the current climate, many tune out the nightly news, unplug social media, and avoid political conversations even with members of their own family.
America has become a country of angry internet commenters. The national conversation has gotten too loud and too ugly. If it can't be beautified, there might at least be broad public support for turning down the volume. So why doesn't somebody try to do just that?
Imagine if some enterprising, earnest Democrat ran on a new theme: Politics doesn't have to be this way.
It's true that the Democratic mood has hardened under Trump. There is a reason that "When they go low, we go high" is no longer in vogue, even among Obama administration alumni. It is viewed as weakness, unilateral disarmament. "Kick them" is fighting back. Certainly, that's the feedback politicians get from their most fervent activists. There is a sense within both parties that their leaders are feeble compromisers who love to lose. Trump won over Republicans by offering an alternative to surrender. Democrats are looking for someone to wave the blue banner, not the white flag.
But Trump imitators in both parties have seldom replicated the success of the real thing. Democrats in particular should be wary of becoming part of the din emanating from Washington. At the very least, this will weaken their case that the Twitter-happy president is the sole cause of the racket.
If there is an untapped silent majority in American politics, it is the millions of normal people of all political persuasions who don't want to live like this. Trump has nothing to offer them. He is not going to change his personality or basic approach to politics at this point.
Someone else could give Americans the peace and quiet they so desperately desire, taking the angry arguments down a notch. There's just one question that remains: Are there any prominent Democrats out there willing to do it?
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
W. James Antle III is the politics editor of the Washington Examiner, the former editor of The American Conservative, and author of Devouring Freedom: Can Big Government Ever Be Stopped?.
-
'Congress could help by providing federal protections'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US
-
Musk vows DOGE pullback as Tesla profits plunge
Speed Read The Tesla SEO says he will soon step back from government matters to devote more time to the company
By Peter Weber, The Week US
-
Dozens dead in Kashmir as terrorists target tourists
Speed Read Visitors were taking pictures and riding ponies in a popular mountain town when assailants open fired, killing at least 26
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK