Trump's 2016 obsession could cost him the 2020 election
If the president spends the next year and a half complaining about how unfairly he was treated in the last election, he could very well lose the next
Late on Thursday, the day former Vice President Joe Biden announced his candidacy for the 2020 Democratic nomination, President Trump appeared on Fox News to discuss the election — the one held two and a half years ago in 2016.
Some of us expected the president's interview with Sean Hannity to be a short chat about "Sleepy Joe" and the rest of the 20-person Democratic field. Instead, Trump ranted about Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation, which he called "an attempted coup," "an attempted overthrow of the United States government," and "the biggest scandal in political history in this country." Depending on how you define "government," at least one of these could be considered an accurate characterization of the pointless, bad-faith exploration of non-existent collusion between Trump's campaign and the Russian government. It was certainly an attempt to cripple Trump's administration, to make it impossible for him to execute the duties of his office. It is now being used as a pretext by many of his opponents — including five Democrats running for president next year — for arguing that he should be impeached.
In addition to airing his grievances with Mueller, Trump also previewed what he claims is his administration's counter-investigation of the process that led to the creation of the special counsel in the first place: the leak of information about Trump's former campaign chair Paul Manafort's lobbying by Ukrainian authorities who sought to elect Hillary Clinton instead ("collusion"), the FISA-approved wiretap of Trump Tower, the activities of various former FBI officials ("absolute dirty cops"). He praised Attorney General William Barr and thanked various GOP congressional hacks for their efforts on his behalf.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
For Hannity's audience on Fox — who apparently had no interest in watching the first round of the NFL draft — this was a treat. But listening to the president, I found myself thinking for the first time in months that Democrats have a good shot at winning the next election.
Trump's fortunes in his re-election campaign will not depend upon the good will of the conservative base. He has secured their allegiance more firmly than any president since Ronald Reagan. The average ex-Tea Party Patriot in rural Alabama is not going to decide at some point between now and next November that, on second thought, he really likes Barack Obama's right-hand man and only wishes that Biden would get behind the Green New Deal and single-payer health care and maybe the so-called BDS movement. The only voters who should really matter to the president are the ones who were actually responsible for electing him last time: the tens of thousands of former Obama supporters in Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio, and Pennsylvania who broke with what must, in some cases, have been decades of partisan allegiance in order to back Trump.
These Obama-Trump voters are not interested in a rehash of the last election. Their support for the president last time was pragmatic rather than ideological. If Trump spends the next year and a half complaining about how unfairly he was treated by his opponents in 2016, he could very well lose in 2020.
If Thursday's interview was any indication, Trump neither knows nor cares what he is supposed to be pitching to these voters. He said nothing about his renegotiation of NAFTA or about his efforts — largely futile — to save what remains of the automobile industry in the post-industrial Midwest. Nor did he mention his withdrawal of American troops from Afghanistan and Syria. Instead he rattled off some half-remembered statistics about employment and complained about how the late Sen. John McCain thwarted the attempts of congressional Republicans to repeal the increasingly popular Affordable Care Act. He also noted that "we have ships and boats."
If Trump's eventual opponent is clever, he or she will exploit his fixation on Mueller and former FBI Director James Comey and former FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page and dozens of other names that ordinary Americans will have forgotten by then and his evident lack of interest in the bread-and-butter issues that actually matter to purple-state voters. The speeches and soundbites would write themselves: "The president wants to talk about who did or said this or that four years ago. I want to talk about what he spent four years not doing: fighting for the American middle class.
Responding to this kind of criticism with complaints about how it's all Democrats' fault will not help Trump in the next election any more than his bizarre praise for "jets the likes of which no country has." It looks increasingly as if his only hope in 2020 is getting to run against an incompetent, inexperienced opponent. No wonder he says he's "rooting" for Pete Buttigieg.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Matthew Walther is a national correspondent at The Week. His work has also appeared in First Things, The Spectator of London, The Catholic Herald, National Review, and other publications. He is currently writing a biography of the Rev. Montague Summers. He is also a Robert Novak Journalism Fellow.
-
Passenger jet, Blackhawk helicopter collide in DC
Speed Read An American Airlines flight with 64 people aboard collided with an Army helicopter, and no survivors have been found
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
White House withdraws Trump's spending freeze
Speed Read President Donald Trump's budget office has rescinded a directive that froze trillions of dollars in federal aid and sowed bipartisan chaos
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Washington DC plane crash: how did mid-air collision happen?
Today's Big Question Experts struggle to explain how sophisticated airspace control system failed to prevent deadly disaster
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
North Carolina Supreme Court risks undermining its legitimacy
Under the radar A contentious legal battle over whether to seat one of its own members threatens not only the future of the court's ideological balance, but its role in the public sphere
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
What's next for Canada after Trudeau's resignation?
Talking Points An election. But not just yet.
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Georgia DA Fani Willis removed from Trump case
Speed Read Willis had been prosecuting the election interference case against the president-elect
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
'Why is the expansion of individual autonomy necessarily always good?'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
Can Trump run in 2028?
Today's Big Question The Constitution says no. But Trump keeps 'floating' the idea.
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
'Paraguay has found itself in a key position'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
Daniel Lurie: San Francisco's moderate next mayor
In the Spotlight Lurie beat a fellow Democrat, incumbent Mayor London Breed, for the job
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published