How a giant Pentagon contract became a political test

Amazon was apparently close to clinching a $10 billion cloud contract, but Trump pumped the brakes

The Pentagon.
(Image credit: Ivan Cholakov/iStock)

The smartest insight and analysis, from all perspectives, rounded up from around the web:

Responding to pressure from President Trump, the Pentagon last week announced a review of the bidding process for a $10 billion contract that has spawned a war among tech giants, said Michael Warren at CNN. The $10 billion contract, called the Joint Enterprise Defense Infrastructure, or JEDI, would give one company the responsibility to move the Department of Defense's computing operations onto the cloud over the course of the next 10 years. It initially involved four bidders: Amazon, Microsoft, IBM, and Oracle; the Pentagon winnowed the field to Amazon and Microsoft. However, "White House officials in recent weeks have shown Trump a document that alleges a large conspiracy" to award the contract to Amazon that caught Trump's attention. The document "is identical to one created by Oracle's top Washington lobbyist" and "provides a visual representation of a narrative that Oracle has been pushing for months — that a web of individuals inside and outside the Defense Department were greasing the wheels."

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

Rehashing the bidding on JEDI endangers national security, said Frank Konkel at Nextgov. "JEDI was designed to be the centerpiece to the Pentagon's technological plans to enable more advanced technology" that lets the military more easily analyze "troves of surveillance information collected by sensors, drones, and other aircraft and satellites." Now the Pentagon's plans hang in limbo, putting the military at a severe disadvantage "against adversaries who are 'weaponizing their use of data.'" That includes China, which is investing billions in AI "and does not face bureaucratic or legal challenges and oversight when making technological decisions."

"Why does President Trump suddenly care who wins the Pentagon's $10 billion cloud-storage contract?" asked Patrick Tucker and Frank Konkel at DefenseOne. Trump's disdain for Bezos is well-known. Oracle, by contrast, enjoys a close relationship with him. Oracle's co-CEO, Safra Catz, served on Trump's transition team. Last year she had a private dinner with the ­president — an opportunity she used to bring up concerns about the JEDI contract. Despite all this, the Pentagon tried to play it fairly. In July, a court ruled against Oracle and upheld the Pentagon's procedures. Defense officials, the court said, "always placed the interests of the war fighter first and have acted without bias, prejudice, or self-interest." Unfortunately, "the same cannot be said of all parties to the debate over JEDI."