Opinion

Why John Roberts is sweating

If legal battles crucial to Trump's survival reach the Supreme Court, the chief justice may cast the deciding vote

This is the editor’s letter in the current issue of The Week magazine.

John Roberts must be feeling a deep sense of dread. As the nation lurches into the constitutional crisis that's been inevitable since the day Donald Trump moved into the White House, the chief justice of the Supreme Court may soon find himself casting the vote that ends — or saves — Trump's presidency. Roberts has been waging a campaign to convince Americans that the Supreme Court is not a partisan body — that it stands apart from the nation's bitter polarization. "We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges," Roberts said last year. To strengthen public perception of the court's legitimacy, Roberts has strategically chosen to become an occasional swing vote, joining the four liberal justices when he deems it prudent. But his efforts to portray the court as a neutral arbiter may not survive the next six months. In its new term, the justices are wading into such incendiary issues as state abortion restrictions, gun control, and whether it's legal to fire employees because they're gay or transgender. And impeachment is now roaring down the tracks.

If the House votes to impeach Trump, it will be Roberts' constitutional duty to preside over the president's trial in the Senate, which promises to be a wildly partisan affair. Even before that trial, Roberts and his court may have to rule on legal battles that could decide Trump's fate. The president has refused to turn over his tax returns to Congress in defiance of the law. He has blocked aides and allies from responding to congressional subpoenas to testify or turn over evidence. Now the White House even contends that it can totally refuse to cooperate with the impeachment inquiry, which it calls "unconstitutional." That claim leaves Congress and the president at an impasse unprecedented in our history — one that only the third branch of government can resolve. History is calling on line two, Mr. Chief Justice. Please pick up.

More From...

Picture of William FalkWilliam Falk
Read All
What reforms can't fix
Police car.
Talking Points

What reforms can't fix

When it's time to let go
Sadness.
Talking Points

When it's time to let go

Patrick Henry in China
Protesters.
Talking Points

Patrick Henry in China

Falling from the sky
Sam Bankman-Fried.
Talking Points

Falling from the sky

Recommended

The many lies of George Santos
George Santos.
Briefing

The many lies of George Santos

Florida GOP moves to take over Disney World special district, not dissolve it
Disney.
Tragic Kingdom

Florida GOP moves to take over Disney World special district, not dissolve it

What reforms can't fix
Police car.
Picture of William FalkWilliam Falk

What reforms can't fix

Why America might ban Chinese ownership of U.S. farmland
Farming.
Briefing

Why America might ban Chinese ownership of U.S. farmland

Most Popular

7 toons about gun violence
Forget the vest, genetically modified silk may soon protect people from bullets.
Feature

7 toons about gun violence

The U.S. economy is shifting toward disinflation. Here's why that's welcome.
Discount pricing
Not getting worse

The U.S. economy is shifting toward disinflation. Here's why that's welcome.

United States shoots down Chinese spy balloon over Atlantic Ocean
A suspected Chinese spy balloon over Montana.
99 Red Balloons?

United States shoots down Chinese spy balloon over Atlantic Ocean