SCOTUS: A glimmer of independence?
The Supreme Court rejects Trump’s request to freeze nearly $2 billion in foreign aid payments

“The Supreme Court has proved its mettle in its first important confrontation with the Trump administration— barely,” said Noah Feldman in Bloomberg. Last week, the court ruled 5-4 that President Trump cannot freeze $2 billion in USAID payments to U.S. contractors who had already completed their work before he took office. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barrett sided with the three liberal justices to affirm a district court’s order that the Trump administration must make the payments immediately. In doing so, they “effectively repudiated Trump’s unlawful executive order that froze all foreign aid spending” in January. That sends the important message that the Trump administration can’t “end-run the existing legal order to do whatever it wants.” But the bad news is that the other four conservative justices dissented, thus signaling to Trump that they’re willing to “side with him in his unlawful behavior,” no matter how extreme.
The other important news is that the Supreme Court’s six conservatives are not “an ideological monolith,” said The Wall Street Journal in an editorial. “The court is far from predictable.” Barrett’s willingness to stand up to Trump earned her vitriolic denunciations from the angry MAGA camp, who denounced her appointment to the court as a “DEI hire” and a “mistake.” I think Barrett was wrong in this case, said Charles C.W. Cooke in National Review, but she is a “terrific justice” and a true originalist whose opinions brim with intelligence, independence, and nuance. The claim that she must automatically vote in favor of the president who appointed her “strikes me as corrupt.” Perhaps her critics have forgotten “the proper role of the judiciary.”
But will Barrett and Roberts consistently stand “as a bulwark” against Trump’s authoritarian power grab? asked Nicholas Bagley in The Atlantic. That’s unclear. Although the two justices sided with the liberals in this case, their ruling was narrow and based on technicalities, and did not explicitly repudiate Trump’s assertion that “he has the constitutional authority to impound federal dollars and ignore Congress’ spending commands.” That claim will be tested again in a much broader way in the near future, as Trump seeks unilateral power to gut agencies and run the government as if it were his private fiefdom. If he can get a fifth vote from the Supreme Court, “expect him to exercise that power again. And again. And again.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
How will the new tax deductions on auto loans work?
the explainer Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act introduced a tax deduction on auto loan interest — but eligibility for the tax break is limited
-
Is Trump actually going to prosecute Obama for 'treason'?
Today's Big Question Or is this just a distraction from the Jeffrey Epstein scandal?
-
5 best movie sequels of all time
The Week Recommends The second time is only sometimes as good as the first
-
'Spending is what card issuers are hoping you will do'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Trump executive order targets homeless
Speed Read It will now be easier for states and cities to remove homeless people from the streets
-
Florida judge and DOJ make Epstein trouble for Trump
Speed Read The Trump administration's request to release grand jury transcripts from the Epstein investigation was denied
-
Trump attacks Obama as Epstein furor mounts
Speed Read The Trump administration accused the Obama administration of 'treasonous' behavior during the 2016 election
-
Deportations: The growing backlash
Feature New poll numbers show declining support for Trump's deportation crackdown
-
Is Stephen Colbert's 'Late Show' cancellation an omen of something worse?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION CBS said its decision to end the talk show was strictly business. But the timing and nature of the announcement has some observers wondering if there's more at play behind the scenes.
-
Citizenship: Trump order blocked again
Feature After the Supreme Court restricted nationwide injunctions, a federal judge turned to a class action suit to block Trump's order to end birthright citizenship
-
Loyalty tests: The purge at the FBI
Feature Kash Patel is conducting polygraph tests on FBI agents to weed out anyone speaking badly about him