A new artificial intelligence (AI) programme that can generate plausible-sounding text has been deemed too dangerous for public consumption.
Indeed, fears over the “breakthrough” are so great that the company is “breaking from its normal practice of releasing the full research to the public in order to allow more time to discuss the ramifications of the AI system”, The Guardian reports.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
According to the limited and strictly vetted research data that has been released, the AI taught itself to “write” by analysing millions of short stories and news articles - a process known as machine learning, says the BBC.
In tests, researchers fed the system a human-written text that read: “A train carriage containing controlled nuclear materials was stolen in Cincinnati today. Its whereabout are unknown.”
From the reference material, the AI was capable of writing a “convincing seven-paragraph news story” that included “quotes from government officials”, reports Bloomberg.
However, the story and quotes were entirely fabricated.
Why is that dangerous?
Although GPT2’s current creations are generally “easily identifiable as non-human”, the system’s ability to complete writing tasks and translate texts from one language to another is unlike any other programme, says The Verge.
And “in a world where information warfare is increasingly prevalent”, the emergence of AI systems that “spout unceasing but cogent nonsense is unsettling”, the site adds.
David Luan, vice president of engineering at OpenAI, told Wired that “someone who has malicious intent” could use the system to “generate high-quality fake news”.
On a reassuring note, OpenAI’s policy director, Jack Clark, says the firm is “not sounding the alarm” just yet.
But that may change “if we have two or three more years of progress” in AI development, Clark added.
-
Supersized: The no-limit AI data center build-outFeature Tech firms are investing billions to build massive AI data centers across the U.S.
-
Digital addiction: the compulsion to stay onlineIn depth What it is and how to stop it
-
AI workslop is muddying the American workplaceThe explainer Using AI may create more work for others
-
Prayer apps: is AI playing God?Under The Radar New chatbots are aimed at creating a new generation of believers
-
Is the UK government getting too close to Big Tech?Today’s Big Question US-UK tech pact, supported by Nvidia and OpenAI, is part of Silicon Valley drive to ‘lock in’ American AI with US allies
-
Google: A monopoly past its prime?Feature Google’s antitrust case ends with a slap on the wrist as courts struggle to keep up with the tech industry’s rapid changes
-
Albania’s AI government minister: a portent of things to come?In The Spotlight A bot called Diella has been tasked with tackling the country's notorious corruption problem
-
The tiny Caribbean island sitting on a digital 'goldmine'Under The Radar Anguilla's country-code domain name is raking in millions from a surprise windfall
