A new artificial intelligence (AI) programme that can generate plausible-sounding text has been deemed too dangerous for public consumption.
Indeed, fears over the “breakthrough” are so great that the company is “breaking from its normal practice of releasing the full research to the public in order to allow more time to discuss the ramifications of the AI system”, The Guardian reports.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
According to the limited and strictly vetted research data that has been released, the AI taught itself to “write” by analysing millions of short stories and news articles - a process known as machine learning, says the BBC.
In tests, researchers fed the system a human-written text that read: “A train carriage containing controlled nuclear materials was stolen in Cincinnati today. Its whereabout are unknown.”
From the reference material, the AI was capable of writing a “convincing seven-paragraph news story” that included “quotes from government officials”, reports Bloomberg.
However, the story and quotes were entirely fabricated.
Why is that dangerous?
Although GPT2’s current creations are generally “easily identifiable as non-human”, the system’s ability to complete writing tasks and translate texts from one language to another is unlike any other programme, says The Verge.
And “in a world where information warfare is increasingly prevalent”, the emergence of AI systems that “spout unceasing but cogent nonsense is unsettling”, the site adds.
David Luan, vice president of engineering at OpenAI, told Wired that “someone who has malicious intent” could use the system to “generate high-quality fake news”.
On a reassuring note, OpenAI’s policy director, Jack Clark, says the firm is “not sounding the alarm” just yet.
But that may change “if we have two or three more years of progress” in AI development, Clark added.
-
The powerful names in the Epstein emailsIn Depth People from a former Harvard president to a noted linguist were mentioned
-
May your loved ones eat, drink and be merry with these 9 edible Christmas giftsThe Week Recommends Let them eat babka (and cheese and licorice)
-
‘The choice isn’t between domestic and foreign talent; the nation was built on both’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Spiralism is the new cult AI users are falling intoUnder the radar Technology is taking a turn
-
X update unveils foreign MAGA boostersSpeed Read The accounts were located in Russia and Nigeria, among other countries
-
AI agents: When bots browse the webfeature Letting robots do the shopping
-
Is AI to blame for recent job cuts?Today’s Big Question Numerous companies have called out AI for being the reason for the culling
-
‘Deskilling’: a dangerous side effect of AI useThe explainer Workers are increasingly reliant on the new technology
-
AI models may be developing a ‘survival drive’Under the radar Chatbots are refusing to shut down
-
Saudi Arabia could become an AI focal pointUnder the Radar A state-backed AI project hopes to rival China and the United States
-
AI is making houses more expensiveUnder the radar Homebuying is also made trickier by AI-generated internet listings
