Paul McCartney: Photographs 1963-64 exhibition review
See The Beatles backstage, in the studio and on tour in this display of McCartney’s snaps
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/537d4/537d429325cf39d64e126a31f5d841239e795ad1" alt="People stand in front of four black and white portraits, one of each of the members of The Beatles"
Paul McCartney “was always the most surprising Beatle”, said Mark Hudson in The Independent. Despite his reputation as a “cheerful, garrulous mop top”, he was the closest thing the group had to a “Renaissance man”: while his bandmates “retreated to mansions in the stockbroker belt” at the height of their mid-1960s fame, McCartney immersed himself in London’s counterculture, exploring the avant-garde art and literature of the era.
It should come as no surprise, then, that he was, by any standard, “a pretty good photographer” – a fact confirmed by this exhibition of his pictures at the National Portrait Gallery. The show brings together some 250 photographs McCartney took between December 1963 and February 1964, a period when the Beatles were suddenly catapulted to previously unimaginable levels of fame. These mostly unseen images capture both the excitement of the “Beatlemania” phenomenon and, perhaps more interestingly, the tedium of life as a touring musician. They represent a compelling record of “a vital cultural episode that never loses its fascination”.
These mostly black-and-white photos capture McCartney and his bandmates “backstage, in recording studios, on the road and airport Tarmac”, said Gabrielle Schwarz in The Daily Telegraph. We see screaming fans, fellow musicians and, occasionally, a bit of formal experimentation, as witnessed by a series of “arty landscapes”.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26e60/26e60cb924a49f61d1c912d9db390eb10f6d3fa2" alt="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg"
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Yet while there are some “fantastic individual shots” – notably a picture of George Harrison “wearing two sequin-trimmed hats” – one can’t help but feel that McCartney did well to stick to his day job. Many photos here are less than memorable, while others are technically inept: a pair of self-portraits taken in a hotel mirror, for instance, are “hopelessly out of focus”, while his attempts to emulate the professional photographers he mixed with, using “unusual framing” and “moody lighting”, only help to highlight his deficiencies.
There are a few misfires here, said Laura Cumming in The Observer. Enlargement doesn’t do McCartney’s photos any favours: many have been belatedly developed from old contact sheets, and are frequently “too soft or blurred”. Nevertheless, the show is a gripping “time capsule” from the era when modern celebrity was being born.
Paul’s camera is often on John Lennon, capturing his shifting “psychological nuances” and “changes of appearance” with fascinating precision. You can see the Fab Four fooling around, and producer George Martin “dapper with a cocktail”. Best of all are images from the group’s first American visit, documenting “hysteria at the airport, fans writing their love in the sand beneath Miami hotel windows, drinks by the pool and the industry closing in”. This is a memorable show – “joyful, hopeful, gregarious, comic”.
National Portrait Gallery, London WC2 (npg.org.uk). Until 1 October
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Who is actually running DOGE?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION The White House said in a court filing that Elon Musk isn't the official head of Donald Trump's Department of Government Efficiency task force, raising questions about just who is overseeing DOGE's federal blitzkrieg
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
How does the Kennedy Center work?
The Explainer The D.C. institution has become a cultural touchstone. Why did Trump take over?
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
What are reciprocal tariffs?
The Explainer And will they fix America's trade deficit?
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
6 spa-like homes with fabulous bathrooms
Feature Featuring a freestanding soaking tub in California and a digital shower system in Illinois
By The Week Staff Published
-
Tessa Bailey's 6 favorite books for hopeless romantics
Feature The best-selling author recommends works by Lyla Sage, Sally Thorne, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Mountains and monasteries in Armenia
The Week Recommends An e-bike adventure through the 'rare beauty' of the West Asian nation
By The Week UK Published
-
Manouchet za'atar (za'atar-topped breads) recipe
The Week Recommends Popular Levantine street food is often enjoyed as a breakfast on the go
By The Week UK Published
-
Becoming Led Zeppelin: an 'exhilarating' documentary
The Week Recommends First authorised documentary captures the legendary rock band's energy – but avoids their 'nearly mythic destructive arc'
By The Week UK Published
-
Eimear McBride picks her favourite books
The Week Recommends Irish novelist shares works by Christa Wolf, Edna O'Brien and Bram Stoker
By The Week UK Published
-
Amandaland: Lucy Punch dazzles in 'glorious' Motherland spin-off
The Week Recommends Joanna Lumley reprises her role as Amanda's 'exquisitely disparaging' mother
By The Week UK Published
-
6 refreshing homes in Miami
Feature Featuring a home previously owned by concert pianist Ruth Greenfield in Spring Garden and a wraparound balcony in Coconut Grove
By The Week Staff Published