Director Edward Berger’s new German-language adaptation of All Quiet on the Western Front won big at the British Academy of Film and Television Arts awards (Baftas) on Sunday, but not without controversy.
The decision to award the German-language adaptation of Erich Maria Remarque’s 1929 anti-war novel has “put the proverbial cat among the pigeons”, said The Independent. While “the film has been well received in Britain and the US, however, it did not receive quite such a warm welcome in its native Germany”.
The film was released on Netflix last October to no great fanfare, but won seven of the 14 categories at the Baftas for which it was nominated, including Best Film, making it the most successful non-English language film in Bafta history. It has also been nominated for nine Oscars including best picture and best international feature.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
However, the film has been decried as “war kitsch” by critics in Germany, with many disputing the director’s decision to invent new storylines and omit significant characters and crucial scenes.
‘A piece of indescribable impudence’
Erich Maria Remarque’s 1928 novel has been “fêted as one of the most important works to have been produced in the German language”, said The Times, which is partly why critics appear to have been so incensed by the 2022 film adaptation.
The original German title, Im Westen nichts Neues (“In the West Nothing New”), was “brilliantly rendered” as “all quiet on the western front” in 1929 by Australian translator Arthur Wheen, The Guardian said, which was a phrase taken from a real military report “endowed with an awful irony. The western front is only quiet for the dead.”
But despite its huge awards haul, the movie adaptation has been panned domestically, with many suggesting Berger had taken too many liberties with the source text.
Hubert Wetzel of the Süddeutsche Zeitung asked whether Berger had even read the book. “At a rough estimate, eight or more tenths of the film consists of scenes that have not only little but nothing to do with the book. If the characters in the film did not have the same names as in the book – Paul Bäumer, Albert Kropp, Kat – it would be difficult to find any parallels worth mentioning.”
The climactic scene of the film, which sees the protagonist killed minutes before the fighting stops, is itself a departure too far, Wetzel wrote. “It arouses the suspicion that this is all about clever marketing: 148 minutes of blockbuster-worthy war kitsch are given a title that is known worldwide, that guarantees prestige and good sales. Maybe even an Oscar”.
The tabloid Bild wrote: “[Berger’s] version of Erich Maria Remarque’s classic is a piece of indescribable impudence. It takes a considerable portion of ignorance, disrespect and Oscar-lust to mess up a masterpiece in such a fashion, to pulverise its content and story so mercilessly.”
Germans ‘sceptical of ambition’
In an interview with The Independent, Berger gave a fairly curt reply to the criticisms, saying: “Germans are always sceptical of ambition. Whenever you try something a little bit different than the norm, they get worried.”
But the director was insistent that the reaction in Germany hadn’t all been negative, adding: “I think the reception overall was very, very positive in Germany, especially from audiences. But of course, we had also critical reviews, you can't please everyone and that’s totally fine.”
Certainly many critics outside of Germany have been more receptive to the film. For The Guardian’s Peter Bradshaw it is an “accomplished and well-acted movie” that offers something timely, creating an instant parallel to Russia’s war in Ukraine.
According to Bradshaw “this is the one film that has awoken our unease at the unquiet eastern front: Vladimir Putin’s war on Ukraine which has featured some brutal old-fashioned trench warfare. The now cliched Faulkner maxim – ‘the past is never dead. It’s not even past’ – comes to mind. This vehement and dynamically shot movie has done something that perhaps even its makers didn’t anticipate – awakened our terror of a new European war.”
That topicality was actually an accident, said CBS News, which noted that the project began three years ago, “well before Vladimir Putin’s army rolled into Ukraine”.
For his part, however, Berger said he recognises the parallels, even explicitly mentioning the Ukraine war in his Bafta acceptance speech. “Today, there’s a different war in Ukraine,” Berger said at the Royal Festival Hall on Sunday. “In five days, it will be the one-year anniversary and there are no heroes in that, or in any war.”
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.