Ed Sheeran won his plagiarism case. That's good for the future of music.
It's big day for Ed Sheeran. In a ruling issued on Wednesday, a British court dismissed accusations that the pop star engaged in copyright infringement with his hit "Shape of You." Songwriters Ross Donoghue and Sami Chokri (who performs as Sami Switch) had argued Sheeran copied parts of their 2015 track "Oh Why," but the judge found these claims to be unsupported, noting comparable elements in a wide range of popular music and accepting Sheeran's contention that he had not heard "Oh Why" when he and his producers were writing "Shape of You."
You don't have to be a Sheeran fan to see the ruling as good news. At least since 2015, when a U.S. court found Robin Thicke plagiarized Marvin Gaye's song "Got to Give It Up," songwriters, performers, and record labels have become more vigilant about possible copyright infringement. The result, they claim, is less experimentation and more preemptive vetting by experts trained to detect even unintentional similarities to other material.
The case for rigorous policing is that it protects creators from being ripped off by more prominent artists. That's true in some cases. But claims of intellectual property are complicated by the copyright terms that substantially exceed the life of the original authors. It makes sense to ensure that this year's hit can't be imitated next year. The benefits of protecting that material decades later are less clear. After all, it's not Gaye himself making claims against Thicke — or Sheeran, in another major suit. It's his estate, which is still collecting royalties nearly forty years after the singer's death in 1984.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The danger of excessive copyright enforcement is heightened when major corporations buy up artists' catalogs. In these cases — including the work of David Bowie and Bruce Springsteen — it's not artists or even their heirs but shareholders who have an interest in shutting down any hint of plagiarism. This isn't a protection for creativity; it's rent-seeking.
Copyright lawsuits aren't the sole reason the music industry seems so stagnant. As the critic Ted Gioia pointed out in an essay earlier this year, a range of incentives favor the endless marketing of old stars and old hits over taking risks with new artists, material, or styles. But the Sheeran judgment might help relieve some of the legal anxieties that threaten the artistic process. Now let's see what happens to Dua Lipa and Taylor Swift.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Samuel Goldman is a national correspondent at TheWeek.com. He is also an associate professor of political science at George Washington University, where he is executive director of the John L. Loeb, Jr. Institute for Religious Freedom and director of the Politics & Values Program. He received his Ph.D. from Harvard and was a postdoctoral fellow in Religion, Ethics, & Politics at Princeton University. His books include God's Country: Christian Zionism in America (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2018) and After Nationalism (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2021). In addition to academic research, Goldman's writing has appeared in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and many other publications.
-
Life in the post-truth era
Opinion The mainstream media can't hold back a tsunami of misinformation
By Theunis Bates Published
-
Magazine printables - November 8, 2024
Puzzles and Quizzes Issue - November 8, 2024
By The Week US Published
-
Magazine solutions - November 8, 2024
Puzzles and Quizzes Issue - November 8, 2024
By The Week US Published
-
The Apprentice: will biopic change how voters see Donald Trump?
Talking Point 'Brutal' film depicts presidential candidate raping first wife Ivana, but some critics believe portrayal is surprisingly sympathetic
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Monsters: why is the Menendez brothers Netflix hit so controversial?
Talking Points Ryan Murphy’s latest true-crime series recounts infamous 1989 Beverly Hills murders, but some critics say his retelling takes too many liberties with the truth
By Irenie Forshaw, The Week UK Published
-
From 'Teenage Dream' to millennial nightmare – where did it go wrong for Katy Perry?
Talking Points Brutal reviews for new album represent a serious setback in the pop star's attempted return
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
A Very Royal Scandal: more trouble for the royals?
Talking Points Amazon Prime's new Prince Andrew drama could be another headache for the royal family
By The Week UK Published
-
Trigger warnings on screen spark dissent
Talking Point Are they a measure of sensitivity or just unnecessary posturing?
By Anya Jaremko-Greenwold, The Week US Published
-
Beetlejuice Beetlejuice: pure 'nostalgia bait'
Talking Points Michael Keaton and Winona Ryder return for sequel to the 1988 cult classic
By The Week UK Published
-
Oasis reunion: can they pull off the masterplan?
Noel and Liam Gallagher have reunited for a 2025 tour after an acrimonious split in 2009
By Richard Windsor, The Week UK Published
-
Why theatres are abandoning intervals
Talking Points Younger audiences prefer pause-free performances but a break ensures extra revenue, and theatregoers' comfort
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published