Behind Trump's decision to cancel his Jan. 6 news conference

Much to Republican party pleasure, former President Donald Trump on Tuesday night canceled a press conference he had scheduled for Jan. 6, blaming the media and the "total bias and dishonesty" of the House select committee investigating the Capitol attack for his decision.
But according to some Trump insiders, there might be more to the president's change of plans than meets the eye, Axios reports. For one thing, many House and Senate leaders had no desire to help plan or deal with Trump's event, which they knew would cause a media firestorm. Sen. Lindsay Graham (R-S.C.), for instance, confirmed he discussed the matter with Trump over the weekend and warned him of the "peril in doing a news conference."
Fox host Laura Ingraham, "another influential Trump ally," also signaled on her show Tuesday night that Trump should ixnay his presser. "Is it smart for President Trump to do a rally on that particular day, versus next week or the week before?" she asked Rep. Jim Banks (R-Ind.), who didn't take the bait as planned.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Trump apparently wanted to use the event to "make a scene" and "deride reporters," a source told The Washington Post, but was repeatedly told such a presser would likely facilitate unfavorable coverage. The ex-president also reportedly "did not know exactly what he wanted his message to be," having announced the conference on a whim and without a concrete plan.
"It was going to be awful, awful press," one Trump adviser said.
According to Politico, a small group of "close allies" eventually approached Trump and convinced him to change his mind, arguing his planned remarks would be "playing into the media's hands."
Said one confidant to Politico: "No matter what he said, it would be reported as more egregious than it was."
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Brigid Kennedy worked at The Week from 2021 to 2023 as a staff writer, junior editor and then story editor, with an interest in U.S. politics, the economy and the music industry.
-
Jack Draper: can Britain's Wimbledon hopeful unseat Carlos Alcaraz?
In the Spotlight 'Volcano of emotion' smashes his racket during defeat in Queen's semi-final but world No.4 shows 'fighting spirit'
-
Crossword: June 23, 2025
The Week's daily crossword
-
How far would Russia go for Iran?
Today's Big Question US air strikes represent an 'embarrassment, provocation and opportunity' all rolled into one for Vladimir Putin
-
Is the US sliding into autocracy?
Talking Point Donald Trump's use of federal troops on home ground, dismissal of dissent and 'braggadocious' military posturing are all symptoms of a shifting political culture
-
Court allows National Guard in LA as Dodgers repel feds
Speed Read The team said they 'denied entry' to ICE agents seeking to enter their stadium
-
'Is it even possible to enjoy a trip without contributing to the problem?'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Trump ramps up Iran threats, demands 'surrender'
Speed Read Trump met with his top aides in the Situation Room on Tuesday
-
Travel ban: It's back and it's bigger
Feature Trump revives a controversial travel ban, targeting mostly poor, nonwhite countries
-
'Big Oil does not accept responsibility'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
ABA sues Trump over 'law firm intimidation policy'
Speed Read Trump has 'used the vast powers of the executive branch to coerce lawyers,' the lawsuit said
-
Judge orders Trump's NIH grant cuts reversed
Speed Read Trump had attempted to slash more than $1 billion in research grants