Elon Musk set up a website for his Department of Government Efficiency to track cuts to the federal budget, but it had a lot of trouble getting off the ground. The DOGE site went live last Wednesday as part of a commitment by Musk to be "as transparent as possible" but was immediately prone to pitfalls. It was later partially fixed but not before online users could take advantage of it at DOGE's expense.
What happened with the launch? The website was set up as a "portal tracking the size of the federal workforce and documenting the number of federal regulations," said The Washington Post. It currently includes a stream of X posts showing a "running log of the actions" that DOGE is taking to slash government funding, including one "applauding the Department of Education, for example, for canceling grants in line with Musk's effort to cut $1 trillion in federal spending."
Before this, though, the website got off to a haphazard start. At the outset, the website was simply a "default WordPress sample page that includes language about an imaginary architecture firm," said tech publication 404Media.
The website was found to be "insecure" and pulling from a "database that can be edited by anyone," said 404Media. This was largely because the site was not hosted on a government server but on an open platform. This led to several posts on the site that read "this is a joke of a .gov site" and "these 'experts' left their database open." The website "feels like it was completely slapped together," with "tons of errors and details leaked in the page source code," an anonymous coder said to 404Media.
What's going on now? It "appears that the DOGE team has since fixed the issue with their website, as the messages are now gone," said Newsweek. The site is "still very much a work in progress," said Fortune.
Musk has "yet to comment on the hacks as he continues promising 'transparency,'" said The New Republic. The website has also "posted classified information" about the country's satellite intelligence-building agency, the National Reconnaissance Office, according to HuffPost, which could create further controversy. |