Myriad factors drive how countries age at different rates, including health, social equity and the environment. And understanding them can allow for intervention to prevent rapid aging.
What factors affect aging rates? A study published in the journal Nature Medicine examined 161,981 participants from 40 countries, including 27 in Europe, seven in Latin America, four in Asia and two in Africa, to determine their "biobehavioral age gap." This is the difference between a person's true chronological age and their age determined by examining their exposome or the "combined physical and social exposures experienced throughout life," said Nature.
Some of the factors were predictable, including medical ones like high blood pressure, heart disease, alcohol consumption, sleep problems and diabetes. But there were also some surprising sociopolitical factors. "Healthy aging, it turns out, is strongly tied to whether politicians act in your interest, having freedom for political parties, whether there are democratic elections, and if you have the right to vote," said the BBC. Faster aging was linked to lower national income levels, exposure to air pollution, social inequality and gender inequality.
European countries had the highest levels of healthy aging, with Denmark topping the list. Egypt and South Africa had the fastest agers, and Latin American countries also showed faster aging. Asian countries were in the middle. And there may be more to the story as non-Europeans are largely underrepresented in the study.
Can these factors be addressed? "Environmental and political conditions leave measurable fingerprints across 40 countries," said Hernan Hernandez, a co-first-author of the study, in a statement. The researchers tie the gap in aging to potentially high levels of stress, which can be worsened by political uncertainty.
Certain factors were shown to protect against rapid aging, including "education, ability to perform activities of daily living, and sound cognitive abilities," said Nature. Others included "physical activity, good memory, and the ability to walk well." Knowing this could allow for early intervention through lifestyle changes.
Risk factors had a stronger impact than protective ones. To remedy this, systemic change is necessary. Governments "must urgently act to reshape environments," said Hernando Santamaria-Garcia, a co-first-author of the study, in a statement, "from reducing air pollution to strengthening democratic institutions." |