Election manifestos 2017: Parties compared on security and terror policies
Terror attacks dominate the election campaign. Here's what the three main camps promise
After three major terror attacks in as many months, this week's general election could be decided on the issue of security.
Theresa May says Jeremy Corbyn cannot be trusted to keep the UK safe, while he has called on her to resign for failing to prevent a rise in terror during her time as home secretary and cutting police numbers by 20,000 while in office.
So how have the three main parties promised to target terrorism in their election manifestos and on the campaign trail?
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Policing
May said existing policy means the number of armed police officers is set to return to 2010 levels after falling in the intervening years. Culture Secretary Karen Bradley said yesterday falling police numbers had been a financial necessity, but added: "It's not just about numbers, it's about powers." The Tory manifesto makes no mention of police numbers but promises to accelerate recruitment procedures.
Labour has pledged to recruit 10,000 more officers to work on community beats in its manifesto. It also says it will change stop-and-search practice which "mean you are still far more likely to be stopped and searched as a black or Asian man".
All frontline officers will be required to wear body cameras while on duty if the Liberal Democrats are elected, although many already do. The party's manifesto says it will set aside an additional £300m for community policing in England and Wales each year.
Security services
In its uncosted manifesto, the Conservative Party pledges to create a "national infrastructure police" force to protect "nuclear sites, railways and the strategic road network". It will unite three existing police forces, although it is not clear if it will involve additional recruitment. Home Secretary Amber Rudd said she is already hiring 1,900 extra staff for MI5 and will raise the security budget by £4bn by 2020.
Labour says it will recruit 1,000 more security and intelligence staff and 500 more border guards. It also promises to support the security services, but says their powers must remain subject to judicial oversight and be "proportionate and necessary".
The Lib Dems, who have promised a second referendum on Brexit, have put the emphasis on cross-border cooperation with European security services, with leader Tim Farron calling on the government to publish a "buried" report on the foreign funding of terrorism, The Guardian says.
Tackling terror online
The Lib Dems and the Tories have taken the strongest lines on this issue – in opposition to each other.
May's immediate reaction to Saturday's London Bridge terror attacks was to demand internet tech companies take responsibility for extremist content. Her remarks were taken as calling for the firms to open up end-to-end encryption to the security services.
Farron warned yesterday that any clampdown on "safe spaces" online risked eroding civil liberties, The Guardian reports. He said: "If we turn the internet into a tool for censorship and surveillance, the terrorists will have won. We won't make ourselves safer by making ourselves less free."
Labour's manifesto promises to include the threat of online radicalism as part of a strategic defence and security review if it wins the 8 June election.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Is Daylight Saving Time good for the climate?
Under the Radar Scientists are split over the potential environmental benefits of the hotly contested time change
By Abby Wilson Published
-
Life in the post-truth era
Opinion The mainstream media can't hold back a tsunami of misinformation
By Theunis Bates Published
-
Magazine printables - November 8, 2024
Puzzles and Quizzes Issue - November 8, 2024
By The Week US Published
-
What is the next Tory leader up against?
Today's Big Question Kemi Badenoch or Robert Jenrick will have to unify warring factions and win back disillusioned voters – without alienating the centre ground
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Turkish aerospace firm hit in deadly 'terrorist attack'
Speed Read The attack killed five people and wounded at least 22 others
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
What is Lammy hoping to achieve in China?
Today's Big Question Foreign secretary heads to Beijing as Labour seeks cooperation on global challenges and courts opportunities for trade and investment
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'This failure to reach out to the entire 9/11 community is unacceptable'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
'It's late, but never too late, to learn the truth'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
The future for Hamas under Yahya Sinwar
The Explainer Choosing hardline 'butcher' as political leader signals Gaza as centre of group's power, but imperils ceasefire negotiations
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Why the 9/11 terror cases still linger after two decades
Talking Points A plea deal reversal follows missed opportunities and complications over torture
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Is Britain about to 'boil over'?
Today's Big Question A message shared across far-right groups listed more than 30 potential targets for violence in the UK today
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published