‘Climate policy is a new front in the US culture wars’

The Maritsa East 2 thermal power plant in Polski Gradets, Bulgaria — (Image credit: Hristo Rusev/Getty Images)

Jump to category:

1. The bad economics of fossil fuel defenders
2. Can someone fill in Dominic Raab about the news? He only watches it on catchup
3. The hypocrisy of ‘progressive’ middle-class drug users is ruining lives
4. Cutting pay for remote workers is a risky move
5. What the media gets wrong about incels

1. The bad economics of fossil fuel defenders

Paul Krugman in The New York Times

Against a backdrop of “unprecedented heat waves, huge forest fires, severe drought in some places and catastrophic flooding”, it seems some Republicans in the US have “toned down their climate denial – in some cases pretending that they never denied the science in the first place”, writes Paul Krugman in The New York Times. But they’ve pivoted to a new line of defence: “the immense economic damage that, they claim, will result if we try to limit emissions of greenhouse gases”. There is little evidence to support their assertion – and it’s become “painfully obvious that politicians opposing climate action aren’t arguing in good faith”, says Krugman. Indeed, for the GOP, “climate policy has become a front in the culture war” propped up by a belief from those on the right that “real men disdain renewable energy and love burning fossil fuels”.

The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE

https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

Join more than 350,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with a selection of The Week’s most interesting, enlightening and entertaining stories - plus daily puzzles.

Latest Videos FromThe Week

Watch full video here:

“What is the role of foreign secretary in the era of Global Britain? News that Dominic Raab was spotted lounging on a beach in Crete on the day Kabul fell certainly sends a message,” writes Marina Hyde in The Guardian. In many ways “Raab’s behaviour was entirely befitting of the revised requirements of his position,” she continued. “The role of foreign secretary in Global Britain does feel like it might involve drinking a beer somewhere nice, as your inflatable makes its lazy progress across the pool.” Indeed, “perhaps this instinctive grasp of what was required is why ‘Westminster watchers’ have spent a lot of the past year farting on about Dominic Raab being one of the quiet success stories of Boris Johnson’s government.”

“Progressive millennials protest vehemently about racism, pronouns and the environment but have a blind spot when it comes to the odd line of coke,” writes Harriet Sergeant in The Telegraph. Indeed, she says, the “explosion of gang violence is directly related to the drug trade. Teenage boys joining gangs and fighting each other is as old as time itself. But drugs have transformed what should be a passing phase of adolescence into a murderous system that sucks in young boys, fuels violence and ruins lives,” Sergeant writes. “Meanwhile middle-class drug users attend protests, call themselves activists and vibrate with rage on social media. If they really want to transform lives, they could do worse than turn down that line of coke on a Saturday night.”

“The pandemic created a tempting opportunity for many urban workers who found themselves working from home: to move somewhere cheaper and take their big city salaries with them,” writes Sarah O’Connor in the Financial Times. That sounds fine in theory, but in post-pandemic practice, O'Connor says, “there is a possibility the dream will evaporate. If you move to cut your living expenses, your employer might cut your pay.” But for an employer to take this approach it could be “risky”, she writes. “As more people work from home permanently, it crystallises the fact that some are paid differently for the same work. It also means pay cuts for some workers whose jobs have not changed.”

“The psychological backdrop to Britain’s first mass shooting in over a decade is, of course, deeply disturbing,” writes Naama Kates on UnHerd. And in regards to “the way much of the media has covered this tragedy, the matter is all but settled: Davison was an incel, another young man driven to violence by a nefarious online movement that breeds terrorists,” she writes. Yet, it seems that the “incel angle” has been focused on “to the exclusion of everything else” in a way that feels “intellectually dishonest”, she suggests. Indeed, “we seem to have lost sight of the perpetrator behind this awful attack, preferring instead to blame the atrocity on incel culture. That may be because it is “more comforting, after all, to seize upon a simple explanation – in this case that incel culture is to blame – than accept that the situation is more complex”, Kates says.

Explore More