How Facebook and Google spread false information about Las Vegas shooter
Tech giants accused of ‘not caring about viral spread of misinformation’ through their platforms
Facebook and Google have been criticised for promoting false news stories claiming that the shooter who killed more than 50 people in Las Vegas was a Democrat who opposed Donald Trump.
The misidentification “spread rapidly from dark corners of the internet to mainstream platforms in the latest example of fake news polluting social media amid a breaking news story,” reports The Guardian.
Google search results related to the name of the man wrongly identified as the killer prominently displayed a post from the online forum 4chan - where users were asserting links between him and the Democrats and left-wing political news websites.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Similarly, on Facebook, a “Safety Check” page the social network offers to “help connect with friends and family and find and give help after a crisis” promoted stories from the right-wing news sites Gateway Pundit and Blogspot, which “also falsely identified the suspected shooter and included misleading speculation on his motivation,” says Forbes.
Google tried to downplay the problem, saying the reason 4chan appeared at the very top of its search results, highlighted with a photo and set aside in a box, was the fault of an algorithm.
“Unfortunately, early this morning we were briefly serving an inaccurate 4chan website in our Search results for a small number of queries,” the company said in a statement. “Within hours, the 4chan story was algorithmically replaced by relevant results. This should not have appeared for any queries, and we’ll continue to make algorithmic improvements to prevent this from happening in the future.”
Facebook said the offending post was spotted by its global security operations centre but that “its removal was delayed by a few minutes”. In that time, it added, the post was “screen-captured and circulated online”.
‘Series of half-measures’
Both tech giants have faced calls to take greater responsibility for the stories they promote following revelations of Russian interference in last year’s US elections.
“Despite months of assurances to the contrary, the internet’s two largest media platforms have yet to adequately protect their systems from enabling the viral spread of misinformation,” says Forbes.
“There’s a way - the fact is, they don’t have the will,” Scott Galloway, a professor of marketing at New York University told the Financial Times.
Facebook has said it will hire 4,000 additional content moderators but Galloway said that was not enough to have an effect: “It’s pi**ing in the ocean - it’s a series of half measures.”
The Outline’s William Turton agrees saying: “The only reasonable conclusion at this point is that tech companies like Google and Facebook do not care about fixing this.”
“Making sure 4chan is not included in this module seems like the lowest possible bar you could set for Google, and yet the company failed to clear it,” he adds.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
How to enjoy the Proms 2024
The Week Recommends This year's concert highlights, how to buy tickets, and where to watch and listen
By Adrienne Wyper, The Week UK Published
-
Why more men are wearing jewellery
The Week Recommends Pop culture is boosting interest in earrings and necklaces, alongside classic tie pins and lapel pins
By Adrienne Wyper, The Week UK Published
-
7 magnificent hotels to visit before the summer crowds descend
The Week Recommends Have beach time in the Dominican Republic or a spa day in Saint-Tropez
By Catherine Garcia, The Week US Published
-
Is the AI bubble deflating?
Today's Big Question Growing skepticism and high costs prompt reconsideration
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
How social media is limiting political content
The Explainer Critics say Meta's 'extraordinary move' to have less politics in users' feeds could be 'actively muzzling civic action'
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Artificial history
Opinion Google's AI tailored the past to fit modern mores, but only succeeded in erasing real historical crimes
By Theunis Bates Published
-
Is Google's new AI bot 'woke'?
Talking Points Gemini produced images of female popes and Black Vikings. Now the company has stepped back.
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Why Google search results have 'gotten worse'
Under The Radar Search engines are 'flooded' with 'garbage' content, say experts
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
2023: the year of the AI boom
the explainer This year, generative artificial intelligence bypassed the metaverse and became the next big thing in tech
By Theara Coleman, The Week US Published
-
Twitter's year of Elon Musk: what happens next?
Why Everyone's Talking About 'Your platform is dying', says one commentator, but new CEO is aiming for profitability next year
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Turns out Facebook isn't as polarizing as previously thought
Talking Point New studies show that, contrary to prior belief, the algorithm has little effect on driving polarization
By Theara Coleman Published