Pros and cons of returning the Elgin Marbles to Greece

Rishi Sunak snubs Greek PM as new row over the controversial artefacts erupts

A visitor to the British Museum in London looks at some of the Elgin Marbles
The sculptures on show in the British Museum are remnants of a carved stone frieze that ran around the outside of the Parthenon Temple on the Acropolis
(Image credit: Getty Images)

The controversy over the Elgin Marbles has been reignited after Downing Street cancelled a meeting between Rishi Sunak and the Greek prime minister at the last minute.

The British and Greek governments are "embroiled in a deepening row", said the BBC, after Kyriakos Mitsotakis, the Greek PM, told the BBC on Sunday that the artefects should be returned because having some in London and the rest in Athens was like "cutting the Mona Lisa in half". No.10 subsequently scrapped talks between Sunak and Mitsotakis that were due to take place in London today. 

The sculptures’ presence in the UK rather than their original homeland of Greece has been controversial for decades. The marbles, which date back more than 2,500 years, were removed from the Parthenon temple in Athens in the early 19th century by British diplomat Lord Elgin, who was serving as ambassador to the Ottoman Empire, which then controlled Greece.

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

Pro: legality

This argument is based on the view that Lord Elgin committed an illegal act when he removed the sculptures from the Parthenon and exported them to Britain between 1802 and 1812. The Ottomans, who controlled Greece at the time, didn't have the right to allow Elgin to visit the Parthenon in the first place, it is said.

Greece’s culture minister, Lina Mendoni, said in May that Lord Elgin used "illicit and inequitable means to seize and export" the Parthenon sculptures, without "real legal permission to do so, in a blatant act of serial theft".

Con: could open floodgates

Some believe that Greece's claim on the Elgin Marbles is the tip of an iceberg. If the British Museum were to return the marbles, the "floodgates might open on other restitution claims", said The Guardian as far back as 2003. Nigeria "wants the return of the Benin bronzes, looted by Britain in 1897", it added.

This argument has endured, as have warnings that museums would be diminished if these claims were answered. "If all restoration demands were met, many of the world’s greatest museums would be emptied of their trademark exhibits," said Elginism.

Pro: Britain 'can't be trusted'

Calls for the return of treasures increased after it was revealed in August that thousands of items had been stolen from the British Museum, reported Sky News

The Elgin Marbles have landed "at the centre of renewed calls for repatriation" amid claims the British Museum's security "cannot be trusted", noted the broadcaster.

Despina Koutsoumba, head of the Greek Association of Archaeologists, said there was shock among colleagues at how items could be stolen from such a renowned institution and then sold on eBay.

Con: safety and preservation

Some argue that, had the marbles remained in Athens, they "likely would have shared the same fate as other ancient sculptures that were destroyed and mutilated", noted Future Learn.

It traces the history of the Parthenon itself, which had sculptures "defaced and displaced" in the sixth century, before being blown up in 1687. Then, during the Grand Tour of the 19th century, European visitors "chiselled away bits and pieces of reliefs and sculptures to take home as souvenirs", while today, the ruins remain vulnerable to Athens' "destructive smog".

Pro: cultural heritage

It is argued that, as the most obvious and symbolic link that modern Athens and modern Athenians have with their ancient ancestors, the pieces represent a crucial and pivotal part of Greek cultural heritage.

"How would Britain feel," asked Future Learn, "if Stonehenge was being held by a foreign power who wouldn't return it?" How is it fair for Britain to keep its most important cultural treasures as well as the most important cultural treasures of other countries?

Con: lost audience

By remaining in the British Museum in London, the marbles serve a "far larger audience" than they would if they were sent back to Athens, said Future Learn.

Writing for The Guardian in 2002, Alan Howarth MP agreed, arguing that "the major museums have always promoted the cultures of other nations by showing and sharing them in an international and historical context".

To continue reading this article...
Continue reading this article and get limited website access each month.
Get unlimited website access, exclusive newsletters plus much more.
Cancel or pause at any time.
Already a subscriber to The Week?
Not sure which email you used for your subscription? Contact us