The judges deciding Donald Trump’s future
The former president is facing a total of 78 criminal charges – and multiple judges
Donald Trump has demanded the removal of the judge overseeing his election fraud case, claiming that “there is no way I can get a fair trial”.
The former US president last week denied four criminal counts related to efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 vote, including conspiracy to defraud the US. In a post on his Truth Social platform yesterday, he said that his legal team would ask District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who was randomly assigned to the case, to step aside on “very powerful grounds”.
Trump is facing a total of 78 felony charges across three criminal cases, many of which carry “the potential for hefty prison time”, said Politico. The case that “appears least likely to put Trump away is the prosecution by the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office”, which has charged him with 34 felony counts of falsifying business records, in relation to hush-money payments to porn star Stormy Daniels.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Here are three of the judges in the other two cases facing the former US leader as he campaigns to be the Republican nominee in the 2024 election.
District Judge Tanya Chutkan
Trump is facing a “familiar foe” in “hard-line judge” Chutkan, said the BBC. In November 2021, she blocked his bid to stop a Congressional committee from accessing White House papers from his administration. “Presidents are not kings, and Plaintiff is not president,” Chutkan wrote in her ruling.
The decision, said the BBC, “gave new life” to the congressional investigation into the Capitol riots, “the results of which came full circle” when the case brought against Trump by Special Counsel Jack Smith was “randomly handed to her”.
Chutkan has overseen “numerous cases” involving 6 January rioters, said Forbes, and has handed down “some of the toughest punishments” doled out, including some that have “gone further than what prosecutors recommended”.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
According to a tally by The Washington Post, through to mid-June, Chutkan sentenced every one of a total 31 defendants to have come before her “to at least some jail or prison time” .
And she has been “remarkably candid when sentencing defendants”, added the BBC. At a hearing last year, she said: “It is not patriotism, it is not standing up for America to stand up for one man – who knows full well that he lost – instead of the Constitution he was trying to subvert.”
Jamaica-born Chutkan, 61, has served on the District Court for Columbia since in 2014, after being nominated by then president Barack Obama.
According to her biography on the court’s website, she had previously worked at a law firm, following an 11-year stint as a public defender in Washington D.C.
She is expected to set a start date for the trial against Trump at a hearing on 28 August.
Magistrate Judge Moxila Upadhyaya
Although Chutkan is due to oversee the 2020 election case, Trump appeared before Magistrate Judge Moxila Upadhyaya in Washington D.C. last week for his arraignment. Magistrate judges such as Upadhyaya “are appointed by majority vote of the active district judges of the court”, said ABC News, and have “the authority to conduct preliminary proceedings in criminal cases, such as arraignments”.
Upadhyaya’s court biography states that she was born in India and raised near Kansas City in Missouri. She was appointed as a magistrate judge last September and has handled proceedings for several 6 January defendants.
Upadhyaya, 35, donated at least $2,550 to political candidates, all Democrats, in the decade before her judicial appointment, according to OpenSecrets.
District Judge Aileen Cannon
In June, Trump was indicted on 37 counts in connection to his handling of classified government documents. The indictment, also brought by Special Counsel Smith, came after the FBI executed a search warrant at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate and recovered hundreds of pages of government records.
Last week, a further three charges related to the case were brought against Trump, who pleaded not guilty.
The Florida district judge assigned to oversee the case is Aileen Cannon, who according to The New York Times has “scant experience running criminal trials”. Colombia-born Cannon, 42, has “already attracted scrutiny amid widespread perceptions that she demonstrated bias in the former president’s favour” last year, when she oversaw a “long-shot” lawsuit filed by Trump challenging the FBI’s search, the paper added.
And she has faced further criticism after allegedly making significant errors in a trial in June, “including one that potentially violated the defendant’s constitutional rights and could have invalidated the proceedings”, according to Reuters.
Cannon, a registered Republican, was appointed to the federal bench by Trump, who gave her a lifetime appointment shortly after he lost re-election. Her appointment “came only 12 years after she was first admitted to practice law, which is the minimum experience that the American Bar Association requires of nominees”, said The Guardian.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
-
'Trump is ruled in contempt'
Today's Newspapers A roundup of the headlines from the US front pages
By The Week Staff Published
-
Hainault sword attack: police hunt for motive
Speed Read Mental health is key line of inquiry, as detectives prepare to interview suspect
By Arion McNicoll, The Week UK Published
-
Shardlake: a 'tightly plotted, gorgeously atmospheric piece of television'
The Week Recommends Arthur Hughes captivates in this 'eminently watchable' Tudor murder mystery
By Irenie Forshaw, The Week UK Published
-
'Can we — the people who have bought so much already — really keep buying more?'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
'Presidential debates are more performance art than actual ways to inform'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
Trump, DeSantis meet for first time since primary
Speed Read The former president and the Florida governor have seemingly mended their rivalry
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Justices set to punt on Trump immunity case
Speed Read Conservative justices signaled support for Trump's protection from criminal charges
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
'Biden is smart to keep the border-security pressure on'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
Arizona grand jury indicts 18 in Trump fake elector plot
Speed Read The state charged Mark Meadows, Rudy Giuliani and other Trump allies in 2020 election interference case
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
'Voters know Biden and Trump all too well'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
Who will win the 2024 presidential election?
In Depth Election year is here. Who are pollsters and experts predicting to win the White House?
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published