Teflon Don: could Trump benefit from indictment?
Some pundits claim prosecution of the former president ‘could add rocket fuel’ to his White House bid

Donald Trump is to become the first former US president to face criminal charges after being indicted by a New York grand jury yesterday.
A Manhattan jury decided that the former president should face “what sources said were more than 30 counts related to business fraud” over hush money payments to porn star Stormy Daniels, reported CNN’s White House reporter Stephen Collinson. Trump, who is alleged to have had an adulterous relationship with Daniels, has denied any wrongdoing and claims to be the victim of “political persecution and election interference” ahead of his 2024 bid.
The indictment is “the latest stunning barrier shattered by the nation’s most unruly president”, said Collinson. But some pundits claim that being prosecuted could ultimately boost Trump’s bid for a second stint in the White House.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What did the papers say?
In “the pre-Trump universe”, an indictment over a “hush money payment to an adult film star” would have been “career-ending”, said The Guardian’s Washington D.C. bureau chief David Smith. But Trump has become a “political judo master”, flipping allegations against him “to his own advantage”.
“The bigger the alleged crime”, Smith wrote, the “more he plays the victim”, and “in the short term at least”, the indictment may “help rather than hurt him in the 2024 Republican primary”.
The Telegraph’s US editor Nick Allen agreed that “a mugshot could become the most effective fundraising tool he has ever had”, adding “rocket fuel” to Trump’s campaign to be the Republicans’ presidential nominee as he accuses Democrats of “weaponising the legal system”.
Early indicators suggest Trump’s indictment may have “cemented and even increased his popularity”, said The Times. The paper pointed to a survey conducted after Trump predicted he would be charged that found he had the backing of 54% of Republican voters for the nomination.
He also appears to have sympathisers beyond the GOP. A separate poll, by Quinnipiac University, showed that 93% of Republicans believed the case against Trump was politically motivated, and that 72% of independent voters and 29% of Democrats agreed.
Not everyone is convinced that he can win through though. “Stop overthinking it,” said Alexander Burns in Politico, “an indictment would be bad for Trump.”
The former president “needs to grow his support”, Burns argued, not “merely rev up people who already care deeply about his every utterance and obsession”. And “it is not likely that many Americans who are not already part of Trump’s base will be inspired to join it” because of the indictment.
But CNN’s Collinson insisted it was “too early to predict how voters, in the GOP primary or in the national electorate, will respond”.
What next?
Lawyers for Trump have indicated that he will turn himself in to appear in a New York court on Tuesday to face the charges. According to The Times, a source “said the details of a surrender were still being worked out”.
For both “the poor or powerful”, said the paper, arrest in New York usually means “being fingerprinted, having a mugshot taken and fielding basic questions such as name and date of birth”. But “there is no playbook for booking a former commander-in-chief”, and Trump has a full US Secret Service protection detail, “meaning agents would need to be by his side at all times”.
However his arrest plays out, the arraignment will be presided over by Judge Juan Merchan, who also recently heard the case against The Trump Organization for tax fraud.
Charges will be read out, followed by a plea from Trump or a lawyer acting on his behalf. The former US leader is then expected to be released to attend court at another date.
Further threats may lay ahead for Trump, because “there could well be squads, if not battalions, of future indictments to come”, wrote Edward Truce for the Financial Times.
“Having broken the dam”, this first indictment has “made it easier for other public prosecutors to make the leap”, he continued. “They will no longer be jumping alone into the darkness or taking the risk of being the first official to aim at the king and miss.”
A criminal charge is not a bar to running for the White House, and nor is a conviction. The Constitution “does not prohibit Trump from serving again as president, even from jail”, said the Los Angeles Times.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Chas Newkey-Burden has been part of The Week Digital team for more than a decade and a journalist for 25 years, starting out on the irreverent football weekly 90 Minutes, before moving to lifestyle magazines Loaded and Attitude. He was a columnist for The Big Issue and landed a world exclusive with David Beckham that became the weekly magazine’s bestselling issue. He now writes regularly for The Guardian, The Telegraph, The Independent, Metro, FourFourTwo and the i new site. He is also the author of a number of non-fiction books.
-
June 14 editorial cartoons
Cartoons Saturday's political cartoons include Donald's 30 dolls, a Flag Day fail and a MAGA Mayflower
-
5 jackbooted cartoons about L.A.'s anti-ICE protests
Cartoons Artists take on National Guard deployment, the failure of due process, and more
-
Some of the best music and singing holidays in 2025
The Week Recommends From singing lessons in the Peak District to two-week courses at Chetham's Piano Summer School
-
Trump's LA deployment in limbo after court rulings
Speed Read Judge Breyer ruled that Trump's National Guard deployment to Los Angeles was an 'illegal' overreach. But a federal appellate court halted the ruling.
-
'Postal commemoration is especially befitting'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Is Trump's military parade 'just a parade'?
Talking Point Critics see an 'echo of authoritarianism'
-
Wall Street has coined a new term for Trump's tariff threats
Feature TACO stands for 'Trump Always Chickens Out'
-
Trump's LA immigration showdown casts shadow over upcoming World Cup
IN THE SPOTLIGHT Amid a massive anti-immigrant detention push, analysts have begun to worry about the United States' plan to host one of the world's biggest athletic events
-
Marines, National Guard in LA can detain Americans
speed read The troops have been authorized to detain anyone who interferes with immigration raids
-
Why is ABC's firing of Terry Moran roiling journalists?
Today's Big Question After the network dropped a longtime broadcaster for calling Donald Trump and Stephen Miller 'world-class' haters, some journalists are calling the move chilling
-
'The attack doesn't need to be so blunt'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day