How dangerous is Vladimir Putin’s new nuclear weapon?
Russian state TV claims ‘Satan II’ atomic missile could wipe UK off map
A single strike from Vladimir Putin’s new RS-28 Samrat nuclear missile could wipe the UK off the face of the Earth, according to Russian TV pundits.
Hours after the Russian president warned that any country seeking to intervene in Ukraine would face a “lightning-fast” response, pro-Putin presenter Vladimir Solovyov claimed that “one Sarmat means minus one Great Britain”.
Following a test launch last week, the Sarmat – nicknamed “Satan II” by Western analysts – was lauded by the Russian Ministry of Defence as “the most powerful missile with the longest range of destruction of targets in the world”.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Putin claimed that the intercontinental ballistic missile, which can fire up to 15 nuclear warheads in a single strike, could “overcome all modern means of missile defence”.
Introducing Satan II
According to Russian news agency Tass, the Satan II missile has been in development since the 2000s and is intended to replace the Soviet-designed Voevoda, which can carry up to three warheads.
The new missile weighs 200 metric tons and has a reported range of more than 6,200 miles, enough to “fly over the North or South poles and strike targets anywhere in the world”, said The Washington Post.
Moscow originally planned to finish trials of the Satan II in 2021, but then postponed the launch for undisclosed reasons.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Russian state media outlet RIA Novosti reported that this week’s launch took place at the Plesetsk Cosmodrome in Arkhangelsk Oblast, in northwestern Russia. The missile landed in the Kura firing range on the Kamchatka Peninsula, in the far east of the country.
New threat?
Following the launch, Dmitry Rogozin, director of Russian space agency Roscosmos, tweeted that the new weapon was a “present to Nato and all sponsors of Ukro-Nazism” – a reference to Russia’s propaganda claims about the war in Ukraine.
Putin said that the “truly unique weapon will strengthen the combat potential of our armed forces, reliably ensure Russia’s security from external threats and provide food for thought for those who, in the heat of frenzied aggressive rhetoric, try to threaten our country”.
Ian Williams, a fellow at the Washington D.C.-based Center for Strategic and International Studies think tank, told The Telegraph that the missile “is probably the most destructive single weapon on Earth”. It “could destroy ten cities with one missile” as the warheads it carries can be “independently targeted”, he added.
But Pentagon spokesperson John Kirby told reporters that the US has been notified in advance of the launch and viewed the test as “routine” and not a threat.
The launch was also played down by Julian Lewis, chair of the UK Parliament’s Intelligence and Security Committee. Lewis told The Telegraph that "Russia and the Western nuclear states have had the ability to annihilate each other ever since they acquired strategic nuclear bombers, followed by intercontinental ballistic missiles, over 60 years ago”.
“Putin adding this new missile to his pre-existing ‘overkill’ capability makes absolutely no difference to the effectiveness of our Trident nuclear deterrent submarines,” he said.
William Alberque, a missile expert at the London-based International Institute for Strategic Studies, agreed that “this is kind of overkill”, because “we couldn’t stop a Russian strike anyway”.
“It is purely intended by Russia to maintain its status as a superpower, to remind the US that they are still building things to kill Americans,” Alberque told The Times.
“Putin’s worst fear is being ignored, becoming nobody. And this will guarantee that people will have nightmares about him.”
The launch “should also be seen in light of Russia’s recent military failures”, said CNN’s senior global military affairs writer Brad Lendon. Analysts believe that the test “was likely being used by Putin as a distraction for his domestic audience”, he reported.
Phillips O'Brien, professor of strategic studies at the University of St Andrews, drew parallels with tactics employed by Nazi Germany in the Second World War, tweeting that “so much of this reeks of Hitler’s ‘wonder weapons’”.
O'Brien told CNN that Hitler’s weapons were “German propaganda to make it look like Germany had a chance of winning the war when things were going very badly. These weapons often existed, but their impact was used to distract the German people.”
Likewise, Putin was “trying to make the Russians confident and proud in their technological prowess, when the war is highlighting constant shortcomings with the Russian military's ability to operate complex systems”, he said.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
-
Who actually needs life insurance?
The Explainer If you have kids or are worried about passing on debt, the added security may be worth it
By Becca Stanek, The Week US Published
-
Sexual wellness trends to know, from products and therapies to retreats and hotels
The Week Recommends Talking about pleasure and sexual health is becoming less taboo
By Theara Coleman, The Week US Published
-
Is the AI bubble deflating?
Today's Big Question Growing skepticism and high costs prompt reconsideration
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Nuclear near-misses
The Explainer From technical glitches to fateful split-second decisions, the world has come to the brink of nuclear war more times than you might think
By Rebecca Messina, The Week UK Published
-
How would we know if World War Three had started?
Today's Big Question With conflicts in Ukraine, Middle East, Africa and Asia-Pacific, the 'spark' that could ignite all-out war 'already exists'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Will Iran attack hinder support for Ukraine?
Today's Big Question Pro-Kyiv allies cry 'hypocrisy' and 'double standards' even as the US readies new support package
By Elliott Goat, The Week UK Published
-
The issue of women and conscription
Under the radar Ukraine military adviser hints at widening draft to women, as other countries weigh defence options amid global insecurity
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Will Iran's attack on Israel backfire?
Today's Big Question The unprecedented targeting of Israel could be a 'godsend' for Netanyahu as the limits of Tehran's military power are exposed
By Elliott Goat, The Week UK Published
-
Labour and nuclear weapons: a turbulent ideological history
The Explainer From the 1940s to Keir Starmer, the party leadership has zigzagged in and out of love with the bomb
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Why is Ukraine backing far-right militias in Russia?
Today's Big Question The role of the fighters is a 'double-edged sword' for Kyiv, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
Why is Islamic State targeting Russia?
Today's Big Question Islamist terror group's attack on 'soft target' in Moscow was driven in part by 'opportunity and personnel'
By Elliott Goat, The Week UK Published