Is Vladimir Putin preparing to use nuclear weapons against Ukraine?
Russian president puts atomic deterrence on standby ahead of talks with Kyiv
Vladimir Putin has ordered Russia’s military to put its nuclear deterrence forces on “high alert”, ramping up fears that he could be prepared to deploy weapons of mass destruction in an effort to bring the war in Ukraine to a swift end.
With the Kremlin facing “dogged” Ukrainian resistance and an “increasingly aggressive Western response” to its invasion, The Telegraph said that the move to ready atomic weapons could be an attempt to “avoid the humiliation” of withdrawing his troops without toppling President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s government in Kyiv.
The announcement does not mean that he is intending to use the weapons, but rather that they are put “into a special mode of combat service”, Putin said yesterday. The move is being made in response to the West’s “unfriendly steps”, he added.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Extreme measures
Russia has more than 1,500 warheads deployed and almost 3,000 in reserve, according to an assessment published in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists on Friday.
The Kremlin has also “invested in a variety of ways to employ those warheads”, The Wall Street Journal said, “including land-based ballistic missiles that could reach the US, submarine-based missiles, and bombs and missiles that could be deployed from aircraft”.
Four days after Putin launched a three-pronged attack on Ukraine, “Russia’s advance has become bogged down and its troops repelled after fierce fighting in the Ukrainian capital, Kyiv, and in Kharkiv, its second city”, The Telegraph reported.
Military analysts yesterday claimed that Russia had suffered its “worst day” since the outbreak of fighting, the paper added. Moscow “admitted for the first time on Sunday that it had suffered casualties but insisted Ukraine’s claims of 4,300 soldiers killed was inaccurate”.
As it becomes clear that “Putin’s assault on Ukraine has failed to yield the quick victories he had anticipated”, nations around the world have also moved to impose “unprecedented new measures” against Russia’s economy, The Guardian reported.
These sanctions have become “a form of economic war”, said the BBC’s economics editor Faisal Islam, and are “designed to push the whole of Russia in to as deep a recession as possible, with the added chaos of bank runs”.
He continued: “These measures make the rouble a one-way downward bet in today’s currency markets. The exclusion of the top Russian domestic retail banks from the Swift messaging system at the same time creates some domestic uncertainty.”
Announcing that Russia’s nuclear deterrent was being put on “high alert”, Putin described the measures taken against the country as “illegitimate sanctions”.
In a televised broadcast from the Kremlin, he said: “I order the defence minister and the chief of the general staff of the Russian armed forces to put the deterrence forces of the Russian army into a special mode of combat service.
“You see that Western countries are not only unfriendly to our country in the economic sphere – I mean illegitimate sanctions,” he added. “Senior officials of leading Nato countries also allow aggressive statements against our country.”
Mass destruction
The invasion of Ukraine has already “left hundreds dead”, The Guardian said. “Russia has launched missile strikes against buildings in Kyiv, Kharkiv and other major Ukrainian cities” and is threatening “an all-out assault not seen since the Second World War”.
Peace negotiations are to be held at the border of Ukraine and Belarus, with a statement posted by Zelenskyy on the Telegram messaging app stating that “diplomats would meet without preconditions at an unspecified location”, The Independent reported.
But Putin’s atomic intervention has “raised the abhorrent spectre of a nuclear option”, said Sky News’ security and defence editor Deborah Haynes.
“Nuclear weapons are designed to pose the ultimate deterrence,” she continued, the thinking being that “a state would never use them against another nuclear power or its allies because it would mean mutually assured destruction as they would fire back”.
If Ukraine “does not back down”, Putin “could in theory launch a limited – in relative terms – nuclear strike to inflict such punishing damage as to force a victory”. But launching atomic weapons may be “a sign of desperation”.
The “invasion is not going to plan” and the Russian military appears “to be incurring significant losses”, she added. But Putin “cannot afford to fail or else he knows his time in power will almost certainly be over, leaving a legacy of humiliation and defeat”.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Italian senate passes law allowing anti-abortion activists into clinics
Under The Radar Giorgia Meloni scores a political 'victory' but will it make much difference in practice?
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Magazine interactive crossword - May 3, 2024
Puzzles and Quizzes Issue - May 3, 2024
By The Week US Published
-
Magazine solutions - May 3, 2024
Puzzles and Quizzes Issue - May 3, 2024
By The Week US Published
-
Nuclear near-misses
The Explainer From technical glitches to fateful split-second decisions, the world has come to the brink of nuclear war more times than you might think
By Rebecca Messina, The Week UK Published
-
How would we know if World War Three had started?
Today's Big Question With conflicts in Ukraine, Middle East, Africa and Asia-Pacific, the 'spark' that could ignite all-out war 'already exists'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Will Iran attack hinder support for Ukraine?
Today's Big Question Pro-Kyiv allies cry 'hypocrisy' and 'double standards' even as the US readies new support package
By Elliott Goat, The Week UK Published
-
The issue of women and conscription
Under the radar Ukraine military adviser hints at widening draft to women, as other countries weigh defence options amid global insecurity
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Will Iran's attack on Israel backfire?
Today's Big Question The unprecedented targeting of Israel could be a 'godsend' for Netanyahu as the limits of Tehran's military power are exposed
By Elliott Goat, The Week UK Published
-
Labour and nuclear weapons: a turbulent ideological history
The Explainer From the 1940s to Keir Starmer, the party leadership has zigzagged in and out of love with the bomb
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Will Iran risk all-out war with Israel?
Today's Big Question Tehran has not wanted to be directly involved in the Middle East conflict so far. But that could be about to change
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Why is Ukraine backing far-right militias in Russia?
Today's Big Question The role of the fighters is a 'double-edged sword' for Kyiv, say commentators
By The Week UK Published