US politicians and the stock market: are they guilty of insider trading?
Legislators are pushing for members of Congress to be banned from trading in individual stocks
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f68d4/f68d495931054e6de16f333843478662095b3440" alt="Nancy Pelosi with husband Paul"
Ever wondered why regular Americans hold their leaders in such low esteem? It’s partly because they suspect them of playing the system, said the St. Louis Post-Dispatch – and who can blame them when you see how politicians speculate on the stock market.
In January 2020, the public had no idea of the impact Covid was about to have, but many members of Congress did, because they were getting classified briefings from experts. In the wake of those briefings, then senator Kelly Loeffler sold off millions in stocks, and invested in a teleconferencing firm. Senator Richard Burr sold his hotel holdings. Senator Rand Paul’s wife bought stock in a pharma company making antivirals.
Whether these were “just happy coincidences or something more sinister”, they looked very dodgy. Some legislators are rightly now pushing for members of Congress to be banned from trading in individual stocks.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26e60/26e60cb924a49f61d1c912d9db390eb10f6d3fa2" alt="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg"
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The proposed legislation “comes not a moment too soon”, said Katrina vanden Heuvel in The Washington Post. The problem is not just that lawmakers can unfairly enrich themselves; it’s that they’re open to glaring conflicts of interest. How can Congress be trusted to dispassionately regulate Big Tech, or the drug giants, when so many of its members have a financial stake in these firms?
To see how it can cloud their judgement, just look at the way Speaker Nancy Pelosi initially tried to resist reform: “We are a free-market economy,” she said. Members of Congress “should be able to participate in that.” This, of course, is the same Nancy Pelosi who, with her venture capitalist husband, has done so well from trading that “there’s an entire community on TikTok” that follows her portfolio – calling her the “queen of investing”.
The proposal is that members of Congress should put their assets in blind trusts while serving, said Theo Wayt in the New York Post. That would help restore public confidence. And for some Democrats it would have “an added bonus: revenge on Senator Joe Manchin”. They’re furious with their colleague for blocking President Biden’s $2tn Build Back Better Act, which would have allocated tens of billions of dollars to fight climate change. If a new law forces Manchin to give up control of his stake in a coal company, they’ll be happy.
It’s “amazing” that we’re even debating this reform, said Robert Reich on CommonDreams.org. It’s a “no-brainer. Let’s get it done.”
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Javier Milei's memecoin scandal
Under The Radar Argentinian president is facing impeachment calls and fraud accusations
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Who is actually running DOGE?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION The White House said in a court filing that Elon Musk isn't the official head of Donald Trump's Department of Government Efficiency task force, raising questions about just who is overseeing DOGE's federal blitzkrieg
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
How does the Kennedy Center work?
The Explainer The D.C. institution has become a cultural touchstone. Why did Trump take over?
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Trade wars, explained
The Explainer Free trade is almost always good for any economy – so why is it so unpopular?
By The Week UK Published
-
Diversity training: a victim of the 'war on woke'
Talking Point More and more US companies have phased out corporate DEI initiatives, and the incoming Trump administration is likely to fuel the cultural shift
By The Week UK Published
-
Volkswagen on the ropes: a crisis of its own making
Talking Point The EV revolution has 'left VW in the proverbial dust'
By The Week UK Published
-
The World Bank and the IMF: still fit for purpose?
In the Spotlight Washington meeting has renewed focus on whether 80-year-old Bretton Woods 'twin' institutions are able to tackle the challenges of the future
By The Week UK Published
-
Post Office: still-troubled horizons
Talking Point Sub-postmasters continue to report issues with Horizon IT system behind 'one of the worst miscarriages of justice in British legal history'
By The Week UK Published
-
The UK's national debt: a terrifying warning
Talking Points OBR's 'grim' report on Britain's fiscal outlook warns of skyrocketing spending, but 'projection' is not a 'forecast'
By The Week Published
-
Copper coins: are they doomed?
Talking Point Treasury says no new 1ps and 2ps needed due to declining use – but would we really miss them?
By The Week UK Published
-
Shein: could the year’s mega-IPO fall apart at the seams?
Talking Point Latest hitch is a pre-float 'security review' that could deter potential investors
By The Week UK Published