Ever wondered why regular Americans hold their leaders in such low esteem? It’s partly because they suspect them of playing the system, said the St. Louis Post-Dispatch – and who can blame them when you see how politicians speculate on the stock market.
Whether these were “just happy coincidences or something more sinister”, they looked very dodgy. Some legislators are rightly now pushing for members of Congress to be banned from trading in individual stocks.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The proposed legislation “comes not a moment too soon”, said Katrina vanden Heuvel in The Washington Post. The problem is not just that lawmakers can unfairly enrich themselves; it’s that they’re open to glaring conflicts of interest. How can Congress be trusted to dispassionately regulate Big Tech, or the drug giants, when so many of its members have a financial stake in these firms?
To see how it can cloud their judgement, just look at the way Speaker Nancy Pelosi initially tried to resist reform: “We are a free-market economy,” she said. Members of Congress “should be able to participate in that.” This, of course, is the same Nancy Pelosi who, with her venture capitalist husband, has done so well from trading that “there’s an entire community on TikTok” that follows her portfolio – calling her the “queen of investing”.
The proposal is that members of Congress should put their assets in blind trusts while serving, said Theo Wayt in the New York Post. That would help restore public confidence. And for some Democrats it would have “an added bonus: revenge on Senator Joe Manchin”. They’re furious with their colleague for blocking President Biden’s $2tn Build Back Better Act, which would have allocated tens of billions of dollars to fight climate change. If a new law forces Manchin to give up control of his stake in a coal company, they’ll be happy.
It’s “amazing” that we’re even debating this reform, said Robert Reich on CommonDreams.org. It’s a “no-brainer. Let’s get it done.”
-
Political cartoons for October 26Cartoons Sunday’s editorial cartoons include Young Republicans group chat, Louvre robbery, and more
-
Why Britain is struggling to stop the ransomware cyberattacksThe Explainer New business models have greatly lowered barriers to entry for criminal hackers
-
Greene’s rebellion: a Maga hardliner turns against TrumpIn the Spotlight The Georgia congresswoman’s independent streak has ‘not gone unnoticed’ by the president
-
Autumn Budget: will Rachel Reeves raid the rich?Talking Point To fill Britain’s financial black hole, the Chancellor will have to consider everything – except an income tax rise
-
Auto loans: Trouble in the subprime economyFeature The downfall of Tricolor Holdings may reflect the growing financial strain low-income Americans are facing
-
Labor: Federal unions struggle to survive TrumpFeature Trump moves to strip union rights from federal workers
-
Nvidia: unstoppable force, or powering down?Talking Point Sales of firm's AI-powering chips have surged above market expectations –but China is the elephant in the room
-
DORKs: The return of 'meme stock' maniaFeature Amateur investors are betting big on struggling brands in hopes of a revival
-
Jaguar's Adrian Mardell steps down: a Maga maulingSpeed Read Jaguar Land Rover had come under fire for 'woke' advertising campaign
-
Warner Bros. kicks cable to the curbFeature Warner Bros. Discovery is splitting into two companies as the cable industry continues to decline
-
Mortgages: The future of Fannie and FreddieFeature Donald Trump wants to privatize two major mortgage companies, which could make mortgages more expensive
