What was the FBI looking for in Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate?

An FBI raid on Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate has prompted outrage among Republicans.

The former US president issued a statement saying that his home in Florida’s Palm Beach was “under siege” after agents began the unannounced raid on Monday.

Trump, who was in New York, said the move was “not necessary or appropriate”, adding: “These are dark times for our nation.” The agents, who had a legally authorised warrant, also broke into the former president’s safe.

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

What did the papers say?

Searching the home of a former US leader is “an extraordinary, historic development” and has “set off a political uproar he could use to stoke his likely 2024 White House bid”, said CNN’s White House correspondent Stephen Collinson.

The raid marks “one of the most staggering twists yet in the story of Trump”, who has already been impeached twice, and threatens to “inject new toxins into the political life of a nation that is hopelessly divided”, Collinson added.

Former CIA officer Buck Sexton told Fox News that it was a “chilling moment in the country’s history”. The FBI was sending a message to Trump and his supporters “that they will come for you if you stand against the machine”, he claimed.

“Well, no,” responded Philip Bump in The Washington Post. The message is actually “that federal criminal investigators had sufficient evidence to convince a judge that evidence of a crime existed at Mar-a-Lago”, he argued.

That the search “instantly became entangled with politics” was “inevitable”, but “there is no reason to think the FBI’s action was triggered by politics”, said Bump, amid reports that aides of President Joe Biden first heard about the raid on Twitter.

The search “appeared to be focused” on material that Trump took to Mar-a-Lago when he left the White House, said The New York Times (NYT).

“Boxes contained many pages of classified documents, according to a person familiar with their contents,” the paper reported. Trump delayed the return of 15 boxes requested by the National Archives “for many months” and the case was “referred to the Justice Department by the archives early this year”.

What next?

The law on preserving White House materials “lacks teeth”, said the NYT, “but criminal statutes can come into play, especially in the case of classified material”.

Under these statutes, anyone who “willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates or destroys” government documents can be prosecuted and face jail time.

All the same, a law enforcement organisation raiding the home of the sitting president’s predecessor and potential future opponent “has no close parallel in American history”, said National Review’s online editor Philip Klein.

Given the implications, the FBI “better have had a really good reason to search Trump’s property”, Klein continued. If it turns out they didn’t, it will make the political system “much more unstable – and should be alarming to anybody, no matter their personal feelings about Trump or his statements and actions”.