Walcott smears shame our intellectual standards
Poet's decision not to stand for professor of poetry at Oxford is not a victory for feminism, but reveals the petty-minded nature of higher education

This is a shameful day for intellectual life in this country. One of the world's greatest living poets has withdrawn from the election for Oxford professor of poetry because of a nasty, nefarious smear campaign.
It is a shabby affair. The delight that the Nobel laureate Derek Walcott had entered the race to become the Oxford professor of poetry turned to dismay after what Professor Hermione Lee, who supported Walcott in the election race, described as a 'campaign of vilification'. A dossier detailing sexual harassment claims from a student about Walcott when he taught at Harvard in the 1980s was anonymously sent a week ago to staff and graduates eligible to vote in next Saturday’s elections. This week Walcott thought enough is enough and threw in the towel. I don’t blame him. The whole saga is indicative of the petty-minded, down-graded nature of higher education and intellectual life in the UK today.
Some have pointed to the C grade given by Walcott to his accuser after she refused his advances – upgraded after an appeal citing the allegations – as proof of his unsuitability as a teacher. Who knows the truth of these assertions? Academic departments know how to cover their backs, and, in an era of grade inflation, to single this instance out is disingenuous.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
I will stand up and say now that even if every word of the allegations are true, if the worst thing that is ever said to you as a woman is "Imagine me making love to you. What would I do? ... Would you make love with me if I asked you?" you need to get out more. If anybody thinks this is a fine day for feminism they need to be disabused of that misapprehension sharpish. If women winning is now associated with mean-spirited, conniving, back-stabbing, then we really have lost the plot.
I'm not condoning the inept passes of English literature professors. Possibly Walcott is guilty of bad judgment. Possibly he was trying it on. But if over-stepping the mark is what we are talking about here – despite the lingering whiff of coercion and abuse that consciously accompanies such allegations – then that is really very little to hold in the balance against the greatness of Walcott. Is it for this that we have deprived a generation of UK students from listening to and being taught by this remarkable poet?
Which brings me on to some of the sneering comments in the liberal press about Walcott's response to the allegations. Walcott has argued that his teaching style was "deliberately personal and intense." Cue the nudge-nudge wink-wink sneers. Why is an intense, personal approach to teaching adults a problem? Poetry is an intense and personal business. I want to be taught great literature by somebody who gives a damn and isn't a passionless automaton. The best teaching relationships I had at university were intense and changed me as a person. Isn't that what we want from higher education rather than a sausage-factory of tick-box skills?
Sorry, but I was so shocked and saddened that he had withdrawn. I have a terrible memory for poetry, but there are lines of Walcott etched in my heart.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Why Gen Z in Nepal is dying over a state social media ban
IN THE SPOTLIGHT A crackdown on digital platforms has pushed younger Nepalis into increasingly violent clashes with government forces
-
Fly like you know what you're doing with these 5 tips for healthy air travel
The Week Recommends Yes to stretching. Even more yesses to hydration.
-
September 9 editorial cartoons
Cartoons Tuesday’s political cartoons include the shadow of Jeffrey Epstein, Russia's answer to peace talks, and tougher citizenship questions
-
'This is a humanitarian, developmental and moral emergency'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
What difference will the 'historic' UK-Germany treaty make?
Today's Big Question Europe's two biggest economies sign first treaty since WWII, underscoring 'triangle alliance' with France amid growing Russian threat and US distance
-
Is the G7 still relevant?
Talking Point Donald Trump's early departure cast a shadow over this week's meeting of the world's major democracies
-
Angela Rayner: Labour's next leader?
Today's Big Question A leaked memo has sparked speculation that the deputy PM is positioning herself as the left-of-centre alternative to Keir Starmer
-
Is Starmer's plan to send migrants overseas Rwanda 2.0?
Today's Big Question Failed asylum seekers could be removed to Balkan nations under new government plans
-
Has Starmer put Britain back on the world stage?
Talking Point UK takes leading role in Europe on Ukraine and Starmer praised as credible 'bridge' with the US under Trump
-
Left on read: Labour's WhatsApp dilemma
Talking Point Andrew Gwynne has been sacked as health minister over messages posted in a Labour WhatsApp group
-
New Year's Honours: why the controversy?
Today's Big Question London Mayor Sadiq Khan and England men's football manager Gareth Southgate have both received a knighthood despite debatable records