Appeals court clears Trump’s Portland troop deployment
A divided federal appeals court ruled that President Trump can send the National Guard to Portland
What happened
A divided panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Monday lifted a lower court’s temporary block of President Donald Trump’s deployment of the Oregon National Guard in Portland.
The ruling was the “latest win for Trump’s effort to deploy the military into cities across the country over the fierce objections of state and local leaders,” Politico said. In Chicago, meanwhile, a 7th Circuit Court of Appeals panel last week unanimously upheld a federal judge’s restraining order barring Trump’s troop deployment in Illinois.
Who said what
In the Oregon case, Judges Ryan Nelson and Bridget Bade, both Trump appointees, said U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut — also appointed by Trump — had “accorded no deference to the president’s determination that he could not execute federal laws with regular forces” outside an ICE facility in Portland. The third judge on the appeals panel, Bill Clinton appointee Susan Graber, urged her 9th Circuit colleagues to reconsider the case “en banc” and “vacate” the “absurd” majority opinion “before the illegal deployment of troops under false pretenses can occur.”
The “legal fight over a Portland deployment has significant ramifications” for Trump’s current and threatened Guard activations in other Democratic-run cities, The New York Times said. Much of the litigation in Portland and Chicago “has turned on whether the Trump administration’s accounts of violence at anti-ICE protests are accurate.” Immergut said Trump’s tales of violence and “rebellion” in “war ravaged” Portland were “simply untethered to the facts.”
Nelson and Bade said even if Trump “may exaggerate” the problems, Immergut was wrong to substitute her “own assessment of the facts for the president’s assessment of the facts.” Graber disagreed, writing that while the “political branches” can engage in “political theater” and a “measure of bending — sometimes breaking — the truth,” the “judicial branch” was founded to “rule on facts, not on supposition or conjecture, and certainly not on fabrication or propaganda.”
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What next?
Trump “is still barred from actually deploying” troops in Oregon, “at least for now,” because the 9th Circuit panel did not rule on Immergut’s second order blocking the deployment of any Guard troops in Portland, The Associated Press said.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Peter has worked as a news and culture writer and editor at The Week since the site's launch in 2008. He covers politics, world affairs, religion and cultural currents. His journalism career began as a copy editor at a financial newswire and has included editorial positions at The New York Times Magazine, Facts on File, and Oregon State University.
-
How climate change is affecting ChristmasThe Explainer There may be a slim chance of future white Christmases
-
The MAGA civil war takes center stage at the Turning Point USA conferenceIN THE SPOTLIGHT ‘Americafest 2025’ was a who’s who of right-wing heavyweights eager to settle scores and lay claim to the future of MAGA
-
The 8 best drama movies of 2025the week recommends Nuclear war, dictatorship and the summer of 2020 highlight the most important and memorable films of 2025
-
The MAGA civil war takes center stage at the Turning Point USA conferenceIN THE SPOTLIGHT ‘Americafest 2025’ was a who’s who of right-wing heavyweights eager to settle scores and lay claim to the future of MAGA
-
CBS pulls ‘60 Minutes’ report on Trump deporteesSpeed Read An investigation into the deportations of Venezuelan migrants to El Salvador’s notorious prison was scrapped
-
Trump administration posts sliver of Epstein filesSpeed Read Many of the Justice Department documents were heavily redacted, though new photos of both Donald Trump and Bill Clinton emerged
-
Is Trump deliberately redacting Epstein files to shield himself?Today’s Big Question Removal of image from publicly released documents prompts accusations of political interference by justice department
-
What Nick Fuentes and the Groypers wantThe Explainer White supremacism has a new face in the US: a clean-cut 27-year-old with a vast social media following
-
Trump HHS moves to end care for trans youthSpeed Read The administration is making sweeping proposals that would eliminate gender-affirming care for Americans under age 18
-
Why does Trump want to reclassify marijuana?Today's Big Question Nearly two-thirds of Americans want legalization
-
Jack Smith tells House of ‘proof’ of Trump’s crimesSpeed Read President Donald Trump ‘engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election,’ hoarded classified documents and ‘repeatedly tried to obstruct justice’
