Appeals court clears Trump’s Portland troop deployment
A divided federal appeals court ruled that President Trump can send the National Guard to Portland
What happened
A divided panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Monday lifted a lower court’s temporary block of President Donald Trump’s deployment of the Oregon National Guard in Portland.
The ruling was the “latest win for Trump’s effort to deploy the military into cities across the country over the fierce objections of state and local leaders,” Politico said. In Chicago, meanwhile, a 7th Circuit Court of Appeals panel last week unanimously upheld a federal judge’s restraining order barring Trump’s troop deployment in Illinois.
Who said what
In the Oregon case, Judges Ryan Nelson and Bridget Bade, both Trump appointees, said U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut — also appointed by Trump — had “accorded no deference to the president’s determination that he could not execute federal laws with regular forces” outside an ICE facility in Portland. The third judge on the appeals panel, Bill Clinton appointee Susan Graber, urged her 9th Circuit colleagues to reconsider the case “en banc” and “vacate” the “absurd” majority opinion “before the illegal deployment of troops under false pretenses can occur.”
The “legal fight over a Portland deployment has significant ramifications” for Trump’s current and threatened Guard activations in other Democratic-run cities, The New York Times said. Much of the litigation in Portland and Chicago “has turned on whether the Trump administration’s accounts of violence at anti-ICE protests are accurate.” Immergut said Trump’s tales of violence and “rebellion” in “war ravaged” Portland were “simply untethered to the facts.”
Nelson and Bade said even if Trump “may exaggerate” the problems, Immergut was wrong to substitute her “own assessment of the facts for the president’s assessment of the facts.” Graber disagreed, writing that while the “political branches” can engage in “political theater” and a “measure of bending — sometimes breaking — the truth,” the “judicial branch” was founded to “rule on facts, not on supposition or conjecture, and certainly not on fabrication or propaganda.”
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What next?
Trump “is still barred from actually deploying” troops in Oregon, “at least for now,” because the 9th Circuit panel did not rule on Immergut’s second order blocking the deployment of any Guard troops in Portland, The Associated Press said.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Peter has worked as a news and culture writer and editor at The Week since the site's launch in 2008. He covers politics, world affairs, religion and cultural currents. His journalism career began as a copy editor at a financial newswire and has included editorial positions at The New York Times Magazine, Facts on File, and Oregon State University.
-
Homes by renowned architectsFeature Featuring a Leonard Willeke Tudor Revival in Detroit and modern John Storyk design in Woodstock
-
Looming drone ban has farmers and farm-state Republicans anxiousIN THE SPOTLIGHT As congressional China-hawks work to limit commercial drone sales from Beijing, a growing number of conservative lawmakers are sounding an agricultural alarm
-
Mind-expanding podcasts you may have missed this fallThe Week Recommends True crime, a book club and a therapeutic outlet led this season’s best podcasts
-
‘It’s critical that Congress get involved’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Canada joins EU’s $170B SAFE defense fundspeed read This makes it the first non-European Union country in the Security Action for Europe (SAFE) initiative
-
Appeals court disqualifies US Attorney Alina HabbaSpeed Read The former personal attorney to President Donald Trump has been unlawfully serving as US attorney for New Jersey, the ruling says
-
White House says admiral ordered potential war crimeSpeed Read The Trump administration claims Navy Vice Adm. Frank ‘Mitch’ Bradley ordered a follow-up strike on an alleged drug-smuggling boat, not Pete Hegseth
-
The military: When is an order illegal?Feature Trump is making the military’s ‘most senior leaders complicit in his unlawful acts’
-
Ukraine and Rubio rewrite Russia’s peace planFeature The only explanation for this confusing series of events is that ‘rival factions’ within the White House fought over the peace plan ‘and made a mess of it’
-
The powerful names in the Epstein emailsIn Depth People from a former Harvard president to a noted linguist were mentioned
-
Honduras votes amid Trump push, pardon vowspeed read President Trump said he will pardon former Honduran president Juan Orlando Hernández, who is serving 45 years for drug trafficking
