Trump hit with revised charges, cemetery complaint
The indictment updates reflect a recent Supreme Court decision about presidential immunity
What happened
Special counsel Jack Smith filed a revised indictment that a new grand jury handed down accusing Donald Trump of plotting to overturn his 2020 election loss. The superseding indictment "reflects the government's efforts to respect and implement" the Supreme Court's ruling in July that granted Trump broad immunity for official acts as president, Smith's office said. Separately, Arlington National Cemetery confirmed that an "incident" had taken place during Trump's visit this week, and "a report was filed."
Who said what
Smith "isn't acting too rattled" by the Supreme Court's immunity decision, David Graham said at The Atlantic. His new indictment is a "little more concise and changes some language, but it keeps the same four felony charges and most of the same evidence" while removing all references to Trump's "attempt to involve the Justice Department in his subversion" and excising his conversations with federal officials.
The Arlington "incident" involved a "verbal and physical altercation" between two Trump campaign staffers and a cemetery official who tried to stop them from "filming and photographing in a section where recent U.S. casualties are buried," NPR said. Without addressing specifics, Arlington said "all participants" had been advised beforehand that "federal law prohibits political campaigns or election-related activities" inside the cemetery, including photographers supporting a "partisan political candidate's campaign." Trump campaign spokesperson Steven Cheung said "there was no physical altercation as described" but an "individual clearly suffering from a mental health episode decided to physically block" Trump's team.
What next?
Smith's team and Trump's lawyers have until Friday to "propose next steps to U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan" before a Sept. 5 hearing, Politico said. Even if Chutkan agrees that Smith's revisions pass muster, "any decision she makes will likely be subject to appeal," The Atlantic said, so the fate of this case, too, rests with the outcome of the presidential election.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Peter has worked as a news and culture writer and editor at The Week since the site's launch in 2008. He covers politics, world affairs, religion and cultural currents. His journalism career began as a copy editor at a financial newswire and has included editorial positions at The New York Times Magazine, Facts on File, and Oregon State University.
-
Donald Trump’s squeeze on VenezuelaIn Depth The US president is relying on a ‘drip-drip pressure campaign’ to oust Maduro, tightening measures on oil, drugs and migration
-
Trump appears numerous times in new Epstein batchSpeed Read
-
Danes ‘outraged’ at revived Trump Greenland pushSpeed Read
-
‘Tension has been building inside Heritage for a long time’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
The MAGA civil war takes center stage at the Turning Point USA conferenceIN THE SPOTLIGHT ‘Americafest 2025’ was a who’s who of right-wing heavyweights eager to settle scores and lay claim to the future of MAGA
-
CBS pulls ‘60 Minutes’ report on Trump deporteesSpeed Read An investigation into the deportations of Venezuelan migrants to El Salvador’s notorious prison was scrapped
-
Trump administration posts sliver of Epstein filesSpeed Read Many of the Justice Department documents were heavily redacted, though new photos of both Donald Trump and Bill Clinton emerged
-
Is Trump deliberately redacting Epstein files to shield himself?Today’s Big Question Removal of image from publicly released documents prompts accusations of political interference by justice department


