What does 'conquering' Gaza mean to Israel?

Israel is doubling down on its war in Gaza. Benjamin Netanyahu's plan to displace much of the Palestinian population while seizing and occupying the territory on a long-term basis is already producing backlash and global outcry. "There will be no in-and-out," Netanyahu said. Israel is "finally going to conquer the Gaza Strip," said Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich. But both Israeli and international critics say the proposal smacks of ethnic cleansing.

The planned offensive and occupation will likely "sharpen everything that makes the Gaza war so controversial," said the BBC. Prolonging and expanding that war "divides Israelis, kills even more Palestinian civilians and horrifies millions around the world." Indeed, anti-government protests broke out in Israel after the plan was announced, said EuroNews. There is "no reason to continue on with this war," said one protester, Miri Wolf. External critics are also sharpening their rhetoric, said The Jerusalem Post. The foreign ministers of Spain, Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, Norway and Slovenia issued a "rare coordinated statement" saying the Israeli plan "will only exacerbate an already catastrophic situation for the civilian Palestinian population," while endangering hostages still held by Hamas, the group said. Officials from France, China and the United Nations also criticized the plan.

What did the commentators say?

A temporary occupation of Gaza would give Israel a "path to ending the war" while destroying Hamas, said David French at The New York Times. But a permanent occupation "would represent a crime against humanity." It would be illegal under international law, as well as a "recipe for endless war." Similarly, while civilians can be temporarily moved to "preserve their lives," any permanent displacement "becomes forcible population transfer, another term for ethnic cleansing." As Netanyahu forges a path forward, it will be seen "whether Israel's new approach is anything more than bluster."

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

Israel's campaign has "no legitimacy, no point and no restraints," said the Haaretz editorial board. It is clear that the aim of the operation is not to release the remaining two dozen or so hostages, who "will be freed only through a deal" with Hamas. Instead, a renewed military operation "will pose a clear and present danger to those who are still alive." If the government has deemphasized retrieving the hostages, the "war has also lost whatever last remnants of legitimacy it still had."

An expanded war will plunge Israel "deeper into darkness, militarily and morally," said Gershom Gorenberg at The Atlantic. Occupying much of Gaza is "unlikely to eliminate Hamas," but it will "expose Israel's soldiers to a long war of attrition" against the terror group. And a permanent displacement of Palestinians would be "ethnic cleansing — a moral catastrophe." Right now, there is "every reason to fear that Israel will plunge deeper into the morass."

What next?

Israeli leaders plan to move after President Donald Trump visits the Middle East next week, said CNN. That offers a "window of opportunity" for Israel and Hamas to make a final deal on the hostages, an Israeli official said. Once the operation begins, Smotrich said, "there will be no withdrawal from the territories we've captured, not even in exchange for hostages."