Court rejects Trump suit against Maryland US judges

Judge Thomas Cullen, a Trump appointee, said the executive branch had no authority to sue the judges

Thomas Cullen, now a federal judge, in 2019
Thomas Cullen, now a federal judge, in 2019
(Image credit: AP Photo / Steve Helber)

What happened

A federal judge Tuesday dismissed President Donald Trump's controversial lawsuit against all 15 U.S. district judges in Maryland, calling the White House's legal maneuver "potentially calamitous" and its broader "concerted effort" to "smear and impugn" federal judges "both unprecedented and unfortunate." Judge Thomas Cullen said the administration's lawsuit was legally defective and the wrong tool to challenge the Maryland district's standing order to pause all contested deportations for two business days.

Who said what

In his 39-page ruling, Cullen, a Trump appointee, said the executive branch had no authority to sue the judges and its "novel" attempt to do so threatened a "constitutional free-for-all" that could upset the balance of powers between the co-equal branches of government. The Justice Department filed its "remarkable" suit in June after growing "increasingly frustrated by rulings blocking Trump's agenda," The Associated Press said, and after "repeatedly accusing federal judges of improperly impeding his powers," especially on immigration.

Many legal experts had predicted the lawsuit "would be thrown out," Politico said, but Cullen's "decision to use the ruling to challenge Trump officials' vitriol against the judiciary" was "more surprising." Cullen "went out of his way to describe the complaint as extremely unusual," pointing to "his own role in the case as a prime example," The New York Times said. He was pulled into the suit from his courthouse in Virginia after the entire Maryland federal bench was "forced to recuse themselves" as parties to the suit.

What next?

The White House isn't "without any recourse" in its effort to litigate its "grievance with the judges," Cullen wrote, and if it "truly believes" that their "standing orders violate the law, it should avail itself of the tried-and-true recourse available to all federal litigants: It should appeal." The Justice Department said in a subsequent court filing that it would do so.

The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up
Rafi Schwartz, The Week US

Rafi Schwartz has worked as a politics writer at The Week since 2022, where he covers elections, Congress and the White House. He was previously a contributing writer with Mic focusing largely on politics, a senior writer with Splinter News, a staff writer for Fusion's news lab, and the managing editor of Heeb Magazine, a Jewish life and culture publication. Rafi's work has appeared in Rolling Stone, GOOD and The Forward, among others.