Is Trump’s Justice Department giving up on corruption?
Justice Department cuts back while going after president’s enemies
President Donald Trump once promised to “drain the swamp” — a metaphor for cleansing Washington, D.C., of corruption. Instead, the Justice Department is being drained of corruption fighters amid evidence of malfeasance in his own administration.
The Justice Department had 36 attorneys working full-time on corruption cases when Trump returned to office in January. “Today it has two,” said NOTUS. The lawyers who worked for the department’s Public Integrity Section have “either quit under pressure, resigned in protest or been detailed to other matters across the nation.” The loss of personnel “screams that public corruption cases are no longer a priority” under Trump, said former prosecutor Andrew Tessman.
What did the commentators say?
The news comes amid reports that Trump border czar Tom Homan last fall “accepted a bag of cash from undercover FBI agents” in a sting operation, said CNN. That bribery investigation was shut down after Trump returned to power, and White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt said the sting was an example of the “weaponization” of the Justice Department by the Biden administration. Trump, meanwhile, is publicly pressuring the Justice Department to go after his enemies, said The Washington Post. In a Truth Social post, the president last week ordered Attorney General Pam Bondi to quickly prosecute his “political rivals and back U.S. attorneys willing to get that job done.”
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
“Pam Bondi isn’t the president’s enforcer,” former federal prosecutor Barbara McQuade said at Bloomberg. The Justice Department has “abided by norms and policies to protect its independence from political influence” since the Watergate era. Now Trump is “blasting through those norms.” The rule of law requires that “each person be treated equally in our legal system.” U.S. attorneys around the country must now decide “whether they are willing to become just another instrument of political power.”
There are “two different rules of law in Trump’s America,” said Albany Law School professor Ray Brescia at MSNBC. The president has sent National Guard troops into Democratic cities while pardoning Jan. 6 rioters. His administration has pursued allegations of mortgage fraud “only against adversaries of the president.” And it has forced out both prosecutors who either decline to go after Trump’s enemies and those who have made cases against his allies. Bottom line: “There’s the rule of law for Trump’s foes, but the rule of law is optional for his allies.”
What next?
Trump’s public pressure on Bondi to prosecute “political foes” like former FBI director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James “could backfire if any cases get to court,” said NBC News. The posts on Truth Social will make it easier for defense attorneys to argue their clients were “targets of selective prosecution.”
Trump’s Justice Department can still “punish” his critics without bringing charges, said The Washington Post. Those investigations cause Trump’s targets to hire defense lawyers at “hefty rates” and cause them “reputational damage” regardless of the outcome. For the president, that “might be part of the point.”
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Joel Mathis is a writer with 30 years of newspaper and online journalism experience. His work also regularly appears in National Geographic and The Kansas City Star. His awards include best online commentary at the Online News Association and (twice) at the City and Regional Magazine Association.
-
Pipe bombs: The end of a conspiracy theory?Feature Despite Bongino and Bondi’s attempt at truth-telling, the MAGAverse is still convinced the Deep State is responsible
-
The robot revolutionFeature Advances in tech and AI are producing android machine workers. What will that mean for humans?
-
Health: Will Kennedy dismantle U.S. immunization policy?Feature ‘America’s vaccine playbook is being rewritten by people who don’t believe in them’
-
DOJ targets ‘disparate impact’ avenues of discrimination protectionIN THE SPOTLIGHT By focusing solely on ‘intentional discrimination,’ the Justice Department risks allowing more subtle forms of bias to proliferate
-
Are Donald Trump’s peace deals unraveling?Today’s Big Question Violence flares where the president claimed success
-
Will Trump’s $12 billion bailout solve the farm crisis?Today’s Big Question Agriculture sector says it wants trade, not aid
-
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem might not be long for TrumplandIN THE SPOTLIGHT She has been one of the most visible and vocal architects of Trump’s anti-immigration efforts, even as her own star risks fading
-
What role will Trump play in the battle over Warner Bros. Discovery?Today’s Big Question Netflix and Paramount fight for the president’s approval
-
Judge orders release of Ghislaine Maxwell recordsSpeed Read The grand jury records from the 2019 prosecution of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein will be made public
-
The Trump administration says it deports dangerous criminals. ICE data tells a different story.IN THE SPOTLIGHT Arrest data points to an inconvenient truth for the White House’s ongoing deportation agenda
-
Is Trump in a bubble?Today’s Big Question GOP allies worry he is not hearing voters
