Is Trump’s Justice Department giving up on corruption?
Justice Department cuts back while going after president’s enemies
President Donald Trump once promised to “drain the swamp” — a metaphor for cleansing Washington, D.C., of corruption. Instead, the Justice Department is being drained of corruption fighters amid evidence of malfeasance in his own administration.
The Justice Department had 36 attorneys working full-time on corruption cases when Trump returned to office in January. “Today it has two,” said NOTUS. The lawyers who worked for the department’s Public Integrity Section have “either quit under pressure, resigned in protest or been detailed to other matters across the nation.” The loss of personnel “screams that public corruption cases are no longer a priority” under Trump, said former prosecutor Andrew Tessman.
What did the commentators say?
The news comes amid reports that Trump border czar Tom Homan last fall “accepted a bag of cash from undercover FBI agents” in a sting operation, said CNN. That bribery investigation was shut down after Trump returned to power, and White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt said the sting was an example of the “weaponization” of the Justice Department by the Biden administration. Trump, meanwhile, is publicly pressuring the Justice Department to go after his enemies, said The Washington Post. In a Truth Social post, the president last week ordered Attorney General Pam Bondi to quickly prosecute his “political rivals and back U.S. attorneys willing to get that job done.”
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
“Pam Bondi isn’t the president’s enforcer,” former federal prosecutor Barbara McQuade said at Bloomberg. The Justice Department has “abided by norms and policies to protect its independence from political influence” since the Watergate era. Now Trump is “blasting through those norms.” The rule of law requires that “each person be treated equally in our legal system.” U.S. attorneys around the country must now decide “whether they are willing to become just another instrument of political power.”
There are “two different rules of law in Trump’s America,” said Albany Law School professor Ray Brescia at MSNBC. The president has sent National Guard troops into Democratic cities while pardoning Jan. 6 rioters. His administration has pursued allegations of mortgage fraud “only against adversaries of the president.” And it has forced out both prosecutors who either decline to go after Trump’s enemies and those who have made cases against his allies. Bottom line: “There’s the rule of law for Trump’s foes, but the rule of law is optional for his allies.”
What next?
Trump’s public pressure on Bondi to prosecute “political foes” like former FBI director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James “could backfire if any cases get to court,” said NBC News. The posts on Truth Social will make it easier for defense attorneys to argue their clients were “targets of selective prosecution.”
Trump’s Justice Department can still “punish” his critics without bringing charges, said The Washington Post. Those investigations cause Trump’s targets to hire defense lawyers at “hefty rates” and cause them “reputational damage” regardless of the outcome. For the president, that “might be part of the point.”
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Joel Mathis is a writer with 30 years of newspaper and online journalism experience. His work also regularly appears in National Geographic and The Kansas City Star. His awards include best online commentary at the Online News Association and (twice) at the City and Regional Magazine Association.
-
Is the US about to lose its measles elimination status?Today's Big Question Cases are skyrocketing
-
‘No one is exempt from responsibility, and especially not elite sport circuits’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Businesses are caught in the middle of ICE activitiesIn the Spotlight Many companies are being forced to choose a side in the ICE debate
-
Judge tosses DOJ petition for Oregon voter dataSpeed Read The decision was made following a letter sent by the DOJ to Minnesota
-
Is the American era officially over?Talking Points Trump’s trade wars and Greenland push are alienating old allies
-
Trump’s ‘Board of Peace’ comes into confounding focusIn the Spotlight What began as a plan to redevelop the Gaza Strip is quickly emerging as a new lever of global power for a president intent on upending the standing world order
-
Washington grapples with ICE’s growing footprint — and futureTALKING POINTS The deadly provocations of federal officers in Minnesota have put ICE back in the national spotlight
-
Trump’s Greenland ambitions push NATO to the edgeTalking Points The military alliance is facing its worst-ever crisis
-
Will Democrats impeach Kristi Noem?Today’s Big Question Centrists, lefty activists also debate abolishing ICE
-
Trump, Senate GOP block Venezuela war powers voteSpeed Read Two Republicans senators flipped their vote back amid GOP pressure
-
White House ends TPS protections for SomalisSpeed Read The Trump administration has given these Somalis until March 17 to leave the US
