Trump moves to gut PBS and NPR in latest salvo against the media
The president's executive order targeting two of the nation's largest public broadcasters comes as the White House seeks to radically reframe how Americans get their news


One of the less bombastic features of the second Trump administration has been the effort to reshape the traditional media ecosystem into a more obsequious institution. That endeavor took a significant step forward on Thursday, when President Donald Trump signed a new executive order aimed at stripping federal funding from NPR and PBS. The president accused the two broadcasters of eschewing a "fair, accurate or unbiased portrayal of current events to taxpaying citizens" in the service of "partisanship and left-wing propaganda."
The 'biggest escalation yet'
Trump's executive order instructs the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, a private entity that distributes government funds to public media outlets, to end its allocation of federal money to PBS and NPR to the "extent allowed by law," said The New York Times. Crucially, however, "only a small portion" of both outlets' budget comes from federal funds, while the vast majority comes from "donors and sponsors." As such, the "immediate impact" of Trump's order is "unclear," particularly given that the Corporation for Public Broadcasting is funded several years in advance to "protect it from political maneuvering."
Even so, Trump's "extraordinary order" marks the "biggest escalation yet" in the White House's "assault on the media," Politico said. Earlier this year, the president signed a separate order designed to "hollow out" Voice of America, another "independent, government-funded media organization the president has long accused of bias." Trump's latest order arrives amid an "already tense" situation between the White House and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which sued the administration on Wednesday over Trump's effort to fire several members of its board, said Axios. Separately, the Federal Communications Commission has recently "launched an investigation" of NPR and PBS, claiming it "appears" their corporate underwriting could violate laws "banning commercial advertisements," said NPR.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
'Countered by local support'
Should Trump's effort to hamstring public broadcasting succeed, rural communities, the "original target audience of educational radio," would "feel the biggest impact," said University of Colorado Boulder Associate Professor of Media Studies Josh Shepperd at The Conversation. There are "few alternatives" for news in rural communities where local journalism has been "hit hard by corporate cuts to newsrooms."
"For decades," public broadcasting outlets have "enjoyed bipartisan support," said Axios. In his first term, Trump had "zeroed out the funding" for PBS and NPR, but lawmakers ultimately "always allocated the funds," CNN said. That was a sign that any "national Republican opposition" to the outlets is often "countered by local support." To that end, the "legal wrangling" already underway to fight the administration's effort to oust Corporation for Public Broadcasting board members could provide a model for a "similar legal challenge" against this latest defunding effort, said The Washington Post. The order is "all but certain to be challenged in court," Politico said.
Many local public broadcasting stations simply "would not exist were there not federal dollars to help," PBS CEO Paula Kerger said to "PBS Newshour." If the order is allowed to move forward, some newsrooms would likely see that reality firsthand.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Rafi Schwartz has worked as a politics writer at The Week since 2022, where he covers elections, Congress and the White House. He was previously a contributing writer with Mic focusing largely on politics, a senior writer with Splinter News, a staff writer for Fusion's news lab, and the managing editor of Heeb Magazine, a Jewish life and culture publication. Rafi's work has appeared in Rolling Stone, GOOD and The Forward, among others.
-
Japan's surname conundrum
Under the Radar Law requiring couples to share one surname hinders women in the workplace and lowers birth rate, campaigners claim
-
How successful would Elon Musk's third party be?
Today's Big Question Musk has vowed to start a third party after falling out with Trump
-
Music reviews: Bruce Springsteen and Benson Boone
Feature "Tracks II: The Lost Albums" and "American Heart"
-
How successful would Elon Musk's third party be?
Today's Big Question Musk has vowed to start a third party after falling out with Trump
-
How would the Trump administration denaturalize immigrant citizens?
Today's Big Question Using civil courts lowers the burden of proof
-
'Trucking is a dangerous business'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Trump sues LA over immigration policies
Speed Read He is suing over the city's sanctuary law, claiming it prevents local law enforcement from cooperating with federal immigration authorities
-
Obama, Bush and Bono eulogize USAID on final day
Speed Read The US Agency for International Development, a humanitarian organization, has been gutted by the Trump administration
-
Trump's strikes on Iran: a 'spectacular success'?
In Depth Military humiliations 'expose the brittleness' of Tehran's ageing regime, but risk reinforcing its commitment to its nuclear program
-
Will NATO countries meet their new spending goal?
today's big question The cost of keeping Trump happy
-
GOP races to revise megabill after Senate rulings
Speed Read A Senate parliamentarian ruled that several changes to Medicaid included in Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill" were not permissible