Is the Supreme Court about to criminalize homelessness?
The court will decide if bans on outdoor camping are 'cruel and unusual'
 
 
Can homeless people be punished for sleeping outside? The Supreme Court is about to decide. The court will soon hear a case to determine whether towns and municipalities "can fine or jail people for camping in public," The Associated Press said. The case arrives before justices at a critical moment: The federal government reported in December that homelessness has surged to its "highest reported level" — nearly 600,000 people across the country — driven by a lack of affordable housing and the end of pandemic-era housing assistance.
Federal courts have previously ruled that the Constitution's Eighth Amendment, which bars cruel and unusual punishment, "forbids criminalizing sleeping in public" if a person has no other place to lay their head, University of Southern California Law Professor Clare Pastore said at The Conversation. Now the city of Grants Pass, Oregon, is challenging that precedent, arguing the Eighth Amendment "forbids only certain cruel methods of punishment," not fines or jail terms. The Supreme Court's decision, Pastore said, will "affect the health and welfare of thousands of people experiencing homelessness."
Homelessness is becoming more visible in the United States, Stateline said. The result? A growing friction in communities that have pivoted "from a focus on the rights of homeless people to the rights of local residents and businesses" affected by encampments. Justices will decide whose rights matter more.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
 
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The Supreme Court can make a difference
Homeless people in Grants Pass are "being punished for the unavoidable human need to sleep," said the ACLU's Scout Katovich. But this isn't just an Oregon issue: "We've seen a troubling uptick" in sleeping and camping bans across the country — even though there aren't nearly enough shelters and beds to give every single homeless person a safe place to rest. "If the Supreme Court rules for Grants Pass, cities could be empowered to treat all of those people as 'criminals.'"
"Obviously homelessness is a distressing, often tragic problem," said Goldwater Institute's Timothy Sandefur. But those problems are driven to a large extent by addiction and mental illness, and "neither of these have ever been viewed as exempting people from the law." In truth, the legal precedent against criminalizing homelessness has only made the problem worse by "confusing and frustrating city officials who want to do something to clean up their communities and help the unsheltered." Instead, forcing cities to allow camping gives them "handy excuses to do nothing about the homelessness problem."
The Supreme Court ruling may have effects beyond the issue of homelessness. A reconsideration of the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment "could have ramifications across a wide swath of the criminal justice system," said The Marshall Project. It could limit prisoner rights while making death penalty executions more frequent, depending on how sweeping a ruling the justices decide to issue in the Grants Pass case.
It's bigger than one case
No matter the Supreme Court's ruling, "governments will still be in search of an actual solution" for homelessness, Mandy Chapman Semple and Nathaniel Fields said at Next City. Cities like New Orleans and Houston have come up with successful approaches that move people to housing by "focusing on one encampment at a time." There doesn't have to be a conflict between the needs of homeless people and public safety. "We do not have to choose one over the other."
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Whatever the court decides to rule, "criminalizing homelessness won't make it go away," Mark Horvath, Adam Westbrook and Lindsay Crouse said at The New York Times. There are many causes of homelessness, including addiction and mental illness. "Some have made unwise choices, and some are simply unlucky." But a few people simply cannot easily afford shelter: 70% of "extremely low income" Americans pay more than half their income on rent. "Becoming homeless is easier than we'd like to think." The Supreme Court will hear the Grants Pass case on April 22.
Joel Mathis is a writer with 30 years of newspaper and online journalism experience. His work also regularly appears in National Geographic and The Kansas City Star. His awards include best online commentary at the Online News Association and (twice) at the City and Regional Magazine Association.
- 
 Saudi Arabia could become an AI focal point Saudi Arabia could become an AI focal pointUnder the Radar A state-backed AI project hopes to rival China and the United States 
- 
 What you need to know about last-minute travel What you need to know about last-minute travelThe Week Recommends You can book an awesome trip with a moment’s notice 
- 
 Codeword: October 29, 2025 Codeword: October 29, 2025The Week's daily codeword puzzle 
- 
 Voting Rights Act: SCOTUS’s pivotal decision Voting Rights Act: SCOTUS’s pivotal decisionFeature A Supreme Court ruling against the Voting Rights Act could allow Republicans to redraw districts and solidify control of the House 
- 
 Will Republicans kill the filibuster to end the shutdown? Will Republicans kill the filibuster to end the shutdown?Talking Points GOP officials contemplate the ‘nuclear option’ 
- 
 Why the White House is behind a rare Supreme Court push to limit gun ownership Why the White House is behind a rare Supreme Court push to limit gun ownershipIN THE SPOTLIGHT Justices are preparing to dive back into the choppy waters of the Second Amendment as the White House pushes to penalize recreational narcotic users 
- 
 Supreme Court points to gutting Voting Rights Act Supreme Court points to gutting Voting Rights Actspeed read States would no longer be required to consider race when drawing congressional maps 
- 
 ‘An exercise of the Republicans justifying their racist positions’ ‘An exercise of the Republicans justifying their racist positions’instant opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day 
- 
 Are inflatable costumes and naked bike rides helping or hurting ICE protests? Are inflatable costumes and naked bike rides helping or hurting ICE protests?Talking Points Trump administration efforts to portray Portland and Chicago as dystopian war zones have been met with dancing frogs, bare butts and a growing movement to mock MAGA doomsaying 
- 
 Supreme Court: Judging 20 years of Roberts Supreme Court: Judging 20 years of RobertsFeature Two decades after promising to “call balls and strikes,” Chief Justice John Roberts faces scrutiny for reshaping American democracy 
- 
 ‘A legacy news brand brings a visibility of its own’ ‘A legacy news brand brings a visibility of its own’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day 
