Prince William is seeking €1.5m (£1.3m) in damages following the publication of photographs showing his wife Kate Middleton topless while on holiday in France.
In a statement read out on the first day of a privacy hearing in France, the Duke of Cambridge described the "clandestine" photographs as "particularly shocking".
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Long-lens photographs of Kate were taken while the royal couple were on holiday at a chateau owned by the Queen's nephew Viscount David Linley in Provence in 2012.
The topless photographs were published in France's Closer magazine, a publication unrelated to the UK title, in September of that year, while regional newspaper La Provence published images of the Duchess sunbathing.
Six people are on trial in connection with the alleged breach of privacy.
Closer editor Laurence Piau is charged with complicity, while Ernesto Mauri, chief executive officer of Closer's publishing house, and Marc Auburtin, publishing director of La Provence, are being prosecuted for using a document obtained by a breach of privacy.
Two of the three accused photographers, Cyril Moreau and Dominique Jacovides, deny taking the topless images, claiming they were unsuccessful in their attempts to track down the royal couple.
Valerie Suau, a photographer for La Provence, admitted taking photos but told the court she never intended to breach the couple's privacy, the BBC reports.
Paul-Albert Iweins, representing Closer magazine, argued that publication of the photos were justified on public interest grounds to disprove rumours that the Duchess of Cambridge was anorexic, Metro reports.
He also argued the couple were already subject to much media attention and the photos did not constitute a breach of privacy.
The court case follows an emergency injunction obtained by the Duke and Duchess in September 2012.
A verdict is expected on 4 July.
-
Syria’s Kurds: abandoned by their US allyTalking Point Ahmed al-Sharaa’s lightning offensive against Syrian Kurdistan belies his promise to respect the country’s ethnic minorities
-
The ‘mad king’: has Trump finally lost it?Talking Point Rambling speeches, wind turbine obsession, and an ‘unhinged’ letter to Norway’s prime minister have caused concern whether the rest of his term is ‘sustainable’
-
5 highly hypocritical cartoons about the Second AmendmentCartoons Artists take on Kyle Rittenhouse, the blame game, and more
-
Israel retrieves final hostage’s body from GazaSpeed Read The 24-year-old police officer was killed during the initial Hamas attack
-
China’s Xi targets top general in growing purgeSpeed Read Zhang Youxia is being investigated over ‘grave violations’ of the law
-
Panama and Canada are negotiating over a crucial copper mineIn the Spotlight Panama is set to make a final decision on the mine this summer
-
Why Greenland’s natural resources are nearly impossible to mineThe Explainer The country’s natural landscape makes the task extremely difficult
-
Iran cuts internet as protests escalateSpeed Reada Government buildings across the country have been set on fire
-
US nabs ‘shadow’ tanker claimed by RussiaSpeed Read The ship was one of two vessels seized by the US military
-
How Bulgaria’s government fell amid mass protestsThe Explainer The country’s prime minister resigned as part of the fallout
-
Femicide: Italy’s newest crimeThe Explainer Landmark law to criminalise murder of a woman as an ‘act of hatred’ or ‘subjugation’ but critics say Italy is still deeply patriarchal
