Supreme Court slightly curtails president's recess appointment power
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that though the president does have the authority to make temporary recess appointments, Congress can stymie that power by declining to go on break.
In a unanimous decision, the court said the president had overstepped his authority in 2012 by appointing new members to the National Labor Relations Board while Congress was in a pro forma recess — essentially a ceremonial session. Republicans held a such a session over the legislature's winter break specifically to block recess appointments, though Obama tried to squeeze in his picks anyway, arguing that a pro forma session was more or less a recess.
Here's the relevant bit from the high court's opinion:
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
In our view, however, the pro forma sessions count as sessions, not as periods of recess. We hold that, for purposes of the Recess Appointments Clause, the Senate is in session when it says it is, provided that, under its own rules, it retains the capacity to transact Senate business. The Senate met that standard here. [Supreme Court]
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Jon Terbush is an associate editor at TheWeek.com covering politics, sports, and other things he finds interesting. He has previously written for Talking Points Memo, Raw Story, and Business Insider.
