Rex Tillerson muddies Trump's messaging on Afghanistan
President Trump laid out his broad strategy for the Afghanistan War on Monday night, promising more troops and a path to victory, but Secretary of State Rex Tillerson used more cautious language on Tuesday afternoon.
While generally praising Trump's strategy, which he described as mostly giving more authority to the U.S. commanders on the ground, he said that with the lessons the U.S. military has learned from fighting the Islamic State in Iraq, "we believe that we can turn the tide of what has been a losing battle over the last year and a half or so and at least stabilize the situation and, hopefully, start seeing some battlefield victories on the part of the Afghan forces." He also had a message for the Taliban: "You will not win a battlefield victory. We may not win one, but neither will you."
That's pretty starkly different language than Trump used on Monday night, says Aaron Blake at The Washington Post, when the president repeatedly asserted that "we will fight to win" and "we will always win." The question, Blake posited, is "which definition of success will prevail and bring an end to the war?" Tillerson's formulation of "stabilizing the situation" is "more based in reality," but "not exactly inspiring for troops who are deployed or will be in the future," but complete victory for the U.S. military is far from assured, Blake notes, adding that it may end up being an argument about semantics: "Trump is clearly bent on declaring victory, no matter how resounding the eventual outcome is."
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Peter has worked as a news and culture writer and editor at The Week since the site's launch in 2008. He covers politics, world affairs, religion and cultural currents. His journalism career began as a copy editor at a financial newswire and has included editorial positions at The New York Times Magazine, Facts on File, and Oregon State University.
-
Critics’ choice: Watering holes for gourmandsFeature An endless selection of Mexican spirits, a Dublin-inspired bar, and an upscale Baltimore pub
-
Argentinian beef is at the center of American farmers’ woesThe Explainer ‘It feels like a slap in the face to rural America,’ said one farmer
-
‘Businesses that lose money and are uncompetitive won’t survive’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Senate votes to kill Trump’s Brazil tariffSpeed Read Five Senate Republicans joined the Democrats in rebuking Trump’s import tax
-
Border Patrol gets scrutiny in court, gains power in ICESpeed Read Half of the new ICE directors are reportedly from DHS’s more aggressive Customs and Border Protection branch
-
Shutdown stalemate nears key pain pointsSpeed Read A federal employee union called for the Democrats to to stand down four weeks into the government standoff
-
Trump vows new tariffs on Canada over Reagan adspeed read The ad that offended the president has Ronald Reagan explaining why import taxes hurt the economy
-
NY attorney general asks public for ICE raid footageSpeed Read Rep. Dan Goldman claims ICE wrongly detained four US citizens in the Canal Street raid and held them for a whole day without charges
-
Trump’s huge ballroom to replace razed East WingSpeed Read The White House’s east wing is being torn down amid ballroom construction
-
Trump expands boat strikes to Pacific, killing 5 moreSpeed Read The US military destroyed two more alleged drug smuggling boats in international waters
-
Trump demands millions from his administrationSpeed Read The president has requested $230 million in compensation from the Justice Department for previous federal investigations
