Now that the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences has canceled plans to introduce a "best popular film" category at next year's Oscars, the organization says everyone misunderstood what the controversial award was really about, although their new explanation only makes things more confusing.
Academy President John Bailey spoke with IndieWire on Thursday shortly after announcing that the award had been scrapped for 2019, and, bizarrely, seemed to suggest that the category would not just have highlighted films that are popular as the name suggests. Outlets like Vanity Fair speculated back in August that the category was little more than a ploy to boost the Oscars' dwindling viewership, and attract mainstream moviegoers who showed up for big, action-packed blockbusters. But Bailey says this isn't entirely true.
"To focus on this new award as if it is somehow oriented primarily toward big-action films, it might be a part of it, but it's about films that have not been recognized, not been seen by people," Bailey said.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
This explanation baffled critics. From the outset, the award's purpose — or how "popular" would be defined — was never really clear. Per The Hollywood Reporter, there had been some internal discussion of only allowing movies that had opened in wide release to be eligible, so it evidently would be more about accessibility than popularity. Bailey told IndieWire the award was needed because "the last three Academy award-winners were not films large numbers of people were going to see." However, as critic Myles McNutt pointed out on Twitter, that's not entirely true: The most recent Best Picture winner, The Shape of Water, actually did open in wide release and therefore could have won best popular film.
Bailey added that the award would only be for studio-backed films that audiences had access to, and used Groundhog Day as an example of one film the popular award would have been perfect for, even though it was only the #13 highest-grossing movie of 1993.
-
Nvidia: unstoppable force, or powering down?Talking Point Sales of firm's AI-powering chips have surged above market expectations –but China is the elephant in the room
-
5 hard-working cartoons about Labor Day celebrationsCartoons Artists take on creation of AI, spelling mistakes, and more
-
Crossword: September 7, 2025The Week's daily crossword puzzle
-
Florida erases rainbow crosswalk at Pulse nightclubSpeed Read The colorful crosswalk was outside the former LGBTQ nightclub where 49 people were killed in a 2016 shooting
-
Trump says Smithsonian too focused on slavery's illsSpeed Read The president would prefer the museum to highlight 'success,' 'brightness' and 'the future'
-
Trump to host Kennedy Honors for Kiss, StalloneSpeed Read Actor Sylvester Stallone and the glam-rock band Kiss were among those named as this year's inductees
-
White House seeks to bend Smithsonian to Trump's viewSpeed Read The Smithsonian Institution's 21 museums are under review to ensure their content aligns with the president's interpretation of American history
-
Charlamagne Tha God irks Trump with Epstein talkSpeed Read The radio host said the Jeffrey Epstein scandal could help 'traditional conservatives' take back the Republican Party
-
CBS cancels Colbert's 'Late Show'Speed Read 'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert' is ending next year
-
Shakespeare not an absent spouse, study proposesspeed read A letter fragment suggests that the Shakespeares lived together all along, says scholar Matthew Steggle
-
New Mexico to investigate death of Gene Hackman, wifespeed read The Oscar-winning actor and his wife Betsy Arakawa were found dead in their home with no signs of foul play
