There are still 3 ways to fight partisan gerrymandering after the Supreme Court defeat

Interns run with decisions released by the U.S. Supreme Court.
(Image credit: Mark Wilson/Getty Images)

On Thursday, the U.S. Supreme Court's conservative majority decided that federal courts have no say in partisan gerrymandering, or the practice of state lawmakers drawing electoral districts to boost their own party at the state and federal level. Advocates of fair and representative electoral maps aren't without options, though. Here are three paths the Supreme Court left open, for now:

1. State courts

The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

2. Nonpartisan redistricting systems

In his opinion, Chief Justice John Roberts pointed to some of independent or nonpartisan redistricting processes created by states like Florida, Michigan, Colorado, and Ohio. Former Attorney General Eric Holder, now head of the National Democratic Redistricting Committee, said his group is pushing for nonpartisan redistricting changes in Arkansas, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma in 2020. But a narrow 5-4 Supreme Court majority upheld independent redistricting commissions in 2014, with retired Justice Anthony Kennedy the deciding vote and Roberts voting no, so reformers are concerned this avenue might close, too.

3. The ballot box

State and federal districts will be drawn in 2021, after the 2020 census, and one way to get representative maps is, as Holder said, electing candidates "who support fair maps." Or maybe divided government: Republicans control the governorship and legislature in 22 states, versus the Democrats' 14. National elections matter, too. House Democrats have approved legislation requiring states to establish independent, nonpartisan commissions, but Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) vows he won't allow it to get a vote in the Senate.

Explore More
Peter Weber, The Week US

Peter has worked as a news and culture writer and editor at The Week since the site's launch in 2008. He covers politics, world affairs, religion and cultural currents. His journalism career began as a copy editor at a financial newswire and has included editorial positions at The New York Times Magazine, Facts on File, and Oregon State University.