Supreme Court hands win to 'dark money' groups in California donor disclosure ruling

In a 6-3 vote along ideological lines, the Supreme Court struck down a California regulation forcing nonprofits to disclose donors' personal information, CNBC reports. The Thursday decision is a victory for the conservative groups who challenged the law, but "bodes ill" for regulation down the line, dissenters note.

The rule required nonprofits to fork over their Schedule B forms — which include the "personal information of all donors nationwide who had contributed more than $5,000 in a given tax year" — so the state could police charity misconduct, CNBC writes. The court's majority ruled Thursday that while California has "an important interest" in preventing such wrongdoing, Schedule B collection does not "form an integral part of California's fraud detection efforts" and is therefore in violation of donors' First Amendment rights, per CNBC and The Hill.

"California's blanket demand that all charities disclose Schedule Bs to the Attorney General is facially unconstitutional," wrote Chief Justice John Roberts in the majority opinion.

The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

Join more than 350,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with a selection of The Week’s most interesting, enlightening and entertaining stories - plus daily puzzles.

Join more than 350,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with a selection of The Week’s most interesting, enlightening and entertaining stories - plus daily puzzles.

Sign up

The dissent, however, argued that such a decision spells trouble for regulating organizations in the future.

"Today's analysis marks reporting and disclosure requirements with a bull's-eye," wrote Justice Sonia Sotomayor. "Regulated entities who wish to avoid their obligations can do so by vaguely waving toward First Amendment 'privacy concerns.'"

Thursday's decision is also a blow to efforts to rein in "dark money political groups," in that it could complicate "donor-disclosure requirements for groups that often pour large sums into elections" but stop just short of triggering disclosure, Politico notes.

"We are now on a clear path to enshrining a constitutional right to anonymous spending in our democracy, and securing an upper hand for dark-money influence in perpetuity," said campaign finance reform advocate and Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), per CNN.