The Senate battle to replace Stephen Breyer will get ugly
In a different world, Senate Republicans could let President Biden fill the vacancy created by Justice Stephen Breyer's retirement from the Supreme Court. Conservatives would still enjoy a 6-3 majority. Wednesday's news did not create a situation like the deaths of Justice Antonin Scalia and Ruth Bader Ginsburg, where the balance of the court was in play. Whatever is going to happen this year with abortion, affirmative action, and a dozen other hotly contested issues remains just as likely to happen. And the next presidential election is over two years away, so there is no Justice Neil Gorsuch repeat coming soon.
We do not currently live in that world. Breyer's own confirmation tells us this: Just nine Republicans voted against him in 1994. That would be unthinkable today. Conservative groups would run ads against the Breyer Nine during the primary season. An even starker illustration of how political norms on judicial nominations have changed: Scalia was unanimously confirmed in 1986, a little over a year before Robert Bork's rejection by the Senate set us on the current trajectory.
But 2022 is an election year in which Democrats are going to try to use the Supreme Court and Roe v. Wade to gin up the enthusiasm of their base — which is otherwise lacking — in an attempt to improve their chances of salvaging their narrow majorities. Republicans are going to want to keep their own voters motivated, and they are going to want their senators to do whatever they can to keep Biden's nominee off the court.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
If Republicans retake the Senate in November, then-Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) can be counted on to keep a nominee in limbo through the next presidential race. Republicans have been willing to make these vacancies an election issue. They won on it in 2016, and it's not clear that it really was that important to their 2020 loss after Justice Amy Coney Barrett was confirmed. Republicans gained House seats and came within two Georgia runoffs of retaining the Senate. They will keep playing hardball until they lose.
Making the Supreme Court a supreme policymaking body on some of the most bitterly divisive issues in the country guaranteed we would get to this point. Republicans won't let a liberal nominee sail through a 50-50 Senate.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
W. James Antle III is the politics editor of the Washington Examiner, the former editor of The American Conservative, and author of Devouring Freedom: Can Big Government Ever Be Stopped?.
-
5 hilariously spirited cartoons about the spirit of Christmas
Cartoons Artists take on excuses, pardons, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Inside the house of Assad
The Explainer Bashar al-Assad and his father, Hafez, ruled Syria for more than half a century but how did one family achieve and maintain power?
By The Week UK Published
-
Sudoku medium: December 22, 2024
The Week's daily medium sudoku puzzle
By The Week Staff Published
-
Supreme Court to weigh transgender care limits
Speed Read The case challenges a Tennessee law restricting care for trans minors
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Supreme Court wary of state social media regulations
Speed Read A majority of justices appeared skeptical that Texas and Florida were lawfully protecting the free speech rights of users
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The pros and cons of a written constitution
Pros and Cons Clarity no substitute for flexibility, say defenders of Britain's unwritten rulebook
By The Week UK Published
-
Judges allowed to use ChatGPT to write legal rulings
Speed Read New guidance says AI useful for summarising text but must not be used to conduct research or legal analysis
By The Week UK Published
-
Pros and cons of the Rwanda deportation policy
Pros and Cons Supporters claim it acts as a deterrent but others say it is illegal and not value for money
By The Week UK Published
-
Is the Comstock Act back from the dead?
Speed Read How a 19th-century law may end access to the abortion pill
By Joel Mathis Published
-
Supreme Court green-lights 4 executions in 4 states in 24 hours
Speed Read
By Peter Weber Published
-
Should Supreme Court justices accept protesters as part of the job?
opinion The sharpest opinions on the debate from around the web
By Brigid Kennedy Published