The Supreme Court struck down President Biden's student loan forgiveness program in a 6-3 ruling on Friday. The program planned to forgive up to $20,000 in debt per person, which was poised to affect over 40 million people, Reuters wrote. The court ruled that Biden and the agency head overstepped their authority in allowing the government to remove the $430 billion federal student loan debt. The decision comes a day after the court ruled against affirmative action.
The opinion specifically rejects the claim that Biden's policy is legal under the 2003 HEROES Act, which allowed debt forgiveness during a national emergency, so that people are not left in "a worse position financially" because of it, explained NBC News. The emergency in question was Covid-19. The previous precedent "requires that Congress speak clearly before a department secretary can unilaterally alter large sections of the American economy," wrote Chief Justice John Roberts on behalf of the court's conservative majority. "However broad the meaning of 'waive or modify,' that language cannot authorize the kind of exhaustive rewriting of the statute that has taken place here."
"The Court acts as though it is an arbiter of political and policy disputes, rather than of cases and controversies," wrote Justice Elena Kagan joined by Justice Sonia Sotomayor and Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson in the dissenting opinion. "Who knows — by next year, the Secretary of Health and Human Services may be found unable to implement the Medicare program under a broad delegation because of his actions' (enormous) 'economic impact.'" The decision comes as a blow to Biden who is seeking reelection in 2024.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
-
How are these Epstein files so damaging to Trump?TODAY'S BIG QUESTION As Republicans and Democrats release dueling tranches of Epstein-related documents, the White House finds itself caught in a mess partially of its own making
-
Margaret Atwood’s memoir, intergenerational trauma and the fight to make spousal rape a crime: Welcome to November booksThe Week Recommends This month's new releases include ‘Book of Lives: A Memoir of Sorts’ by Margaret Atwood, ‘Cursed Daughters’ by Oyinkan Braithwaite and 'Without Consent' by Sarah Weinman
-
‘Tariffs are making daily life less affordable now’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Trump DOJ sues to block California redistrictingSpeed Read California’s new congressional map was drawn by Democrats to flip Republican-held House seats
-
GOP retreats from shutdown deal payout provisionSpeed Read Senators are distancing themselves from a controversial provision in the new government funding package
-
Catholic bishops rebuke Trump on immigrationSpeed Read ‘We feel compelled’ to ‘raise our voices in defense of God-given human dignity,’ the bishops said
-
House releases Epstein emails referencing TrumpSpeed Read The emails suggest Trump knew more about Epstein’s sex trafficking of underage women than he has claimed
-
Newsom slams Trump’s climate denial at COP30speed read Trump, who has called climate change a ‘hoax,’ declined to send any officials to this week’s summit
-
UK, Colombia halt intel to US over boat attacksSpeed Read Both countries have suspended intelligence sharing with the US over the bombing of civilian boats suspected of drug smuggling
-
Trump pardons 2020 fake electors, other GOP alliesSpeed Read The president pardoned Rudy Giuliani and more who tried to overturn his 2020 election loss
-
Supreme Court to decide on mail-in ballot limitsSpeed Read The court will determine whether states can count mail-in ballots received after Election Day
