Bill Gates, the founder of Microsoft, says humans should be concerned about the threat posed to them by the rise of artificial intelligence.
The comments came just a few days after a senior member of Microsoft Research, Eric Horvitz said that he "fundamentally" did not believe AI presented any great risks.
Gates' contradictory view of the potential harm that AI could cause humans was expressed during an "ask me anything" Q&A session on Reddit.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
In response to a user's question, Gates wrote: "I am in the camp that is concerned about super intelligence. First the machines will do a lot of jobs for us and not be super intelligent. That should be positive if we manage it well. A few decades after that though the intelligence is strong enough to be a concern. I agree with Elon Musk and some others on this and don't understand why some people are not concerned."
Gates is not alone in his fears about the potential threat posed by machines. Professor Stephen Hawking recently said he believed it was entirely possible that machines equipped with sophisticated AI could "spell the end of the human race".
US entrepreneur Elon Musk, speaking at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) AeroAstro Centennial Symposium in October also expressed fears about the future of technology, arguing that AI is humanity's "biggest existential threat".
He said: "I think we should be very careful about artificial intelligence. If I had to guess at what our biggest existential threat is, it's probably that. So we need to be very careful with artificial intelligence. I'm increasingly inclined to think that there should be some regulatory oversight, maybe at the national and international level, just to make sure that we don't do something very foolish.
"With artificial intelligence we're summoning the demon."
Microsoft researcher Horvitz, however, takes a different view. In a recent interview he said: "There have been concerns about the long-term prospect that we lose control of certain kinds of intelligences. I fundamentally don't think that's going to happen."
He added: "I think that we will be very proactive in terms of how we field AI systems, and that in the end we'll be able to get incredible benefits from machine intelligence in all realms of life, from science to education to economics to daily life."
In spite of his fears, Gates said that if Microsoft had not been a success, by now he "would probably be a researcher in AI".
-
Supersized: The no-limit AI data center build-outFeature Tech firms are investing billions to build massive AI data centers across the U.S.
-
Digital addiction: the compulsion to stay onlineIn depth What it is and how to stop it
-
AI workslop is muddying the American workplaceThe explainer Using AI may create more work for others
-
Prayer apps: is AI playing God?Under The Radar New chatbots are aimed at creating a new generation of believers
-
Is the UK government getting too close to Big Tech?Today’s Big Question US-UK tech pact, supported by Nvidia and OpenAI, is part of Silicon Valley drive to ‘lock in’ American AI with US allies
-
Google: A monopoly past its prime?Feature Google’s antitrust case ends with a slap on the wrist as courts struggle to keep up with the tech industry’s rapid changes
-
Albania’s AI government minister: a portent of things to come?In The Spotlight A bot called Diella has been tasked with tackling the country's notorious corruption problem
-
The tiny Caribbean island sitting on a digital 'goldmine'Under The Radar Anguilla's country-code domain name is raking in millions from a surprise windfall
