Elon Musk reportedly hopes to charge $20 a month for Twitter 'blue checkmark' verification status
Twitter's new "Chief Twit," Elon Musk, is strongly considering charging users to keep their blue "verified" checkmarks, Platformer's Casey Newton reported Sunday, citing two people familiar with the matter. Verified users will have to subscribe to a revamped Twitter Blue subscription service that will cost $19.95 a month, up from $4.99 currently, The Verge added. "Under the current plan, verified users would have 90 days to subscribe or lose their blue checkmark."
Musk has given employees working on the project until Nov. 7 to launch this new paid verification plan or they will be fired, The Verge reports. Musk tweeted to one user Sunday that "the whole verification process is being revamped right now," and responded to a Twitter poll that found (as of early Monday) nearly 80 percent of respondents saying they would pay nothing for verification by tweeting, "Interesting."
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
"In fact, I would not pay a dime for verification," Swisher adds. "In fact, social media should pay its creators and treat them with respect, instead of unleashing knuckleheads on them." Semafor's Benjy Sarlin predicted that the only two categories for a $20-a-month subscription would be "'I have an employer who requires/expenses it' or 'I am way too into Twitter in an off-putting way and want to advertise that fact.'"
Verification isn't just an ego trip, Quartz's Scott Nover notes. "1.) It's a way to show users which account is the real Justin Bieber or Anderson Cooper or, hell, Guy Fieri and 2.) it's a way for Twitter to signal what/who is a reputable news source/journalist." And added to Musk's other actions as Chief Twit, he doesn't give the endeavor much chance of success.
-
5 cinematic cartoons about Bezos betting big on 'Melania'Cartoons Artists take on a girlboss, a fetching newspaper, and more
-
The fall of the generals: China’s military purgeIn the Spotlight Xi Jinping’s extraordinary removal of senior general proves that no-one is safe from anti-corruption drive that has investigated millions
-
Why the Gorton and Denton by-election is a ‘Frankenstein’s monster’Talking Point Reform and the Greens have the Labour seat in their sights, but the constituency’s complex demographics make messaging tricky
-
Moltbook: the AI social media platform with no humans allowedThe Explainer From ‘gripes’ about human programmers to creating new religions, the new AI-only network could bring us closer to the point of ‘singularity’
-
Will regulators put a stop to Grok’s deepfake porn images of real people?Today’s Big Question Users command AI chatbot to undress pictures of women and children
-
Australia’s teen social media ban takes effectSpeed Read Kids under age 16 are now barred from platforms including YouTube, TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, Snapchat and Reddit
-
Inside a Black community’s fight against Elon Musk’s supercomputerUnder the radar Pollution from Colossal looms over a small Southern town, potentially exacerbating health concerns
-
X update unveils foreign MAGA boostersSpeed Read The accounts were located in Russia and Nigeria, among other countries
-
Google avoids the worst in antitrust rulingSpeed Read A federal judge rejected the government's request to break up Google
-
Supreme Court allows social media age check lawSpeed Read The court refused to intervene in a decision that affirmed a Mississippi law requiring social media users to verify their ages
-
What's Linda Yaccarino's legacy? And what's next for X?Today's Big Question An 'uncertain future' in the age of TikTok
