The Week The Week
flag of US
US
flag of UK
UK
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/skoGBi9qKFoUtnNWkovjJQ.jpg

SUBSCRIBE

Try 6 Free Issues

Sign in
  • View Profile
  • Sign out
  • The Explainer
  • Talking Points
  • The Week Recommends
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletters
  • From the Magazine
  • The Week Junior
  • More
    • Politics
    • World News
    • Business
    • Health
    • Science
    • Food & Drink
    • Travel
    • Culture
    • History
    • Personal Finance
    • Puzzles
    • Photos
    • The Blend
    • All Categories
  • Newsletter sign up Newsletter
  • The Week Evening Review
    Hegseth faces war crime questions, voluntary conscription in Europe, and career minimalism

     
    TALKING POINTS

    Are the US boat strikes a war crime?

    Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is facing bipartisan scrutiny after he reportedly ordered U.S. forces to “kill everybody” in a strike on an alleged Venezuelan drug-trafficking boat. If those reports are accurate, critics say, Hegseth and the servicemembers who carried out the attack may be guilty of war crimes.

    The initial Sept. 2 attack on a Venezuelan boat left two survivors “clinging to the smoldering wreck,” said The Washington Post. Then a Special Forces commander ordered a second strike to comply with Hegseth’s order, and those survivors were “blown apart in the water.” Hegseth’s alleged instruction to kill all boat occupants, even if they could no longer fight, would be an “order to show no quarter, which would be a war crime,” said Todd Huntley, a former military lawyer now at Georgetown Law, to the Post. But other officials said Hegseth’s order “did not specifically address” what should happen if there were survivors, said The New York Times. 

    Defending Americans or murder?
    Hegseth’s alleged order is a “war crime that endangers every American in uniform,” said former Green Beret Karl K. Schneider at PennLive. Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions mandates that combatants who are “out of the fight due to wounds, surrender or shipwreck” must be treated humanely. Targeting survivors of an attack is “not combat; it is murder.” That strikes at the “moral authority” of the U.S. America “must not commit war crimes.”

    “Why is Hegseth being attacked for defending Americans?” said Nicole Russell at USA Today. President Donald Trump was elected to “take drug cartels, terrorism and illegal immigration seriously.” Polls show that most Republicans believe the benefits of taking on cartels “outweigh the risks.”

    Defiant tone
    The civilian boat crews were “not at war” with the U.S., said Fred Kaplan at Slate. So the real question is not whether Hegseth committed war crimes but whether he’s a “criminal, plain and simple.” While a Fox News host, Hegseth crusaded on behalf of veterans accused of war crimes. As defense secretary, he fired top Pentagon attorneys who provided a buffer against illegal orders. Hegseth is a “thug and proud of it.”

    The Post’s report “sent shock waves throughout Washington,” said The Hill. But Hegseth “struck a defiant tone” to reporters at a Cabinet meeting yesterday, said Axios. The sinking of “narcoterrorists” boats has “only just begun,” he said.

     
     

    Statistic of the day

    212: The number of suspected drug-smuggling boats stopped by the U.S. Coast Guard from September 2024 to October 2025, according to the organization. At least 41 of the vessels, nearly 20%, had “no illicit contraband on board when interdicted,” and 24 of these 41 vessels didn’t appear to “commit any federal criminal offense.”

     
     
    TODAY’S BIG QUESTION

    Is conscription the answer to Europe’s security woes?

    French President Emmanuel Macron insists France’s new voluntary national service program, announced last week, is not about “sending our youth to Ukraine.” The plan “stops short” of full conscription and will involve recruiting paid volunteers to sign up for 10 months of military service, said France. But the growing realization that Russian aggression could “easily spill into Europe” has put “intense pressure” on countries across the continent to “quickly expand the ranks of full-time soldiers and reservists that shrank during the post-Cold War peace,” said The New York Times.

    What did the commentators say?
    The countries “closest to Russian borders,” such as Estonia, Finland, Latvia and Lithuania, already practice forms of conscription, said The Times. But the war in Ukraine and recent Russian drone incursions into NATO airspace have “reignited the debate across the continent.” 

    In Poland, plans are “underway for every man to go through military training,” said The New York Times. Denmark recently expanded its military conscription lottery to include women, while Croatia has gone further, voting in October to reintroduce compulsory military service. 

    Last month, Germany opted for a “new military service” that does not reinstate conscription, which ended in 2011, but does “include the potential for that,” said DW. It marks the “first unmistakable shift in German security policy for a generation,” said The Spectator. This is the “minimum a serious country does when confronted with the concrete possibility of war on its own continent.”

    What next?
    Measures to boost voluntary enlistment cannot get around the central problem that fewer than a third of EU citizens say they would fight for their country in a war, according to a 2024 Gallup poll. France’s armed forces chief, General Fabien Mandon, warned last month that while France has the resources to defeat Moscow, it lacks the “spirit.” If “our country falters because it’s not prepared to accept — let’s be honest — to lose its children, to suffer economically because defense production will take precedence, then we are at risk.”

     
     
    QUOTE OF THE DAY

    ‘I was saying, Who’s more incompetent — that man or my man? I had a man, and he had a man. They were both incompetent.’

    Trump, to the press during a televised Cabinet meeting, seemingly slighting Vice President JD Vance while talking about last year’s debate between Vance and Gov. Tim Walz (D-Minn.), after calling the governor a “grossly incompetent man” 

     
     
    the explainer

    Workers branch out, not step up, with career minimalism

    The Gen Z workforce has long been called entitled and lazy, but the generation’s method of career movement may be a response to the unfavorable job market. Younger workers are embracing career minimalism, in which they move between job opportunities rather than strive for upward mobility. The method could provide more security, flexibility and fulfillment.

    What’s career minimalism?
    We have “traded the rigid career ladder for the career lily pad,” said Morgan Sanner, a Gen Z career expert, at Glassdoor. Instead of climbing the rungs of a ladder, people are “moving toward opportunities that fit their needs in the moment,” said Forbes. 

    This is especially the case among younger workers. Instead of being ambitious to move their way up in the workplace, 68% of Gen Z workers “wouldn’t pursue management if it weren’t for the paycheck or title,” said a survey by Glassdoor. With career minimalism, workers are “prioritizing security and expansion over elevation” as a result of a “landscape of mass layoffs, AI disruption and widespread burnout.”

    Several factors have encouraged the shift toward career minimalism, but the largest is the job market’s volatility. The “traditional career ladder promised workers pensions, stability and prestige markers as a reward for their long-term commitment,” said Chris Martin, a lead researcher at Glassdoor, to Fast Company. The “past few generations of workers have seen these promises broken or hollowed out, and Gen Z’s views have changed accordingly.” Increasing the breadth of work rather than focusing on moving up also combats skill obsolescence as industries are rapidly changing due to technological advances.

    How is it changing the workplace?
    Gen Z has embraced the side hustle. Having a secondary job allows people to “diversify income streams without abandoning job security,” said Glassdoor. They have become “central to Gen Z’s identity, offering creative, entrepreneurial or activist outlets that main jobs cannot supply,” said Fortune. 

    While Gen Z has become a kind of poster child for career minimalism, millennials, Gen Xers and Baby Boomers are “adopting it for their own reasons,” said Forbes. Career minimalism “addresses challenges that affect professionals in every generation,” including “broken advancement systems, burnout, shifting career paths, and the desire for autonomy.” The “future of work is becoming less about relentless climbing and more about choosing roles that reflect a person’s values, energy and goals.”

     
     

    Good day ✝️

    … for Popemobile repurposing. An armored car previously used by the late Pope Francis has been transformed into a mobile health clinic that Christian leaders hope will soon be deployed to provide care to Palestinian children in Gaza. Francis blessed the initiative, which was overseen by the Catholic organization Caritas, before he passed away.

     
     

    Bad day 📱

    … for social media scrolling. Watching short-form content, such as TikTok videos, Instagram Reels and YouTube shorts, may negatively impact brain function, according to a study published by the American Psychological Association. Greater short-form consumption was associated with poorer cognitive performance, especially in skills that help us stay focused and resist distractions.

     
     
    Picture of the day

    Egg-stravagant

    The 112-year-old Imperial Winter Egg is displayed at Christie’s auction house in London before selling for a record-breaking $30.6 million. Featuring intricate engravings and more than 4,500 diamonds, it’s one of 43 surviving eggs made by the House of Fabergé for the Russian royal family. 
    Wiktor Szymanowicz / Future Publishing / Getty Images

     
     
    Puzzles

    Daily crossword

    Test your general knowledge with The Week's daily crossword, part of our puzzles section, which also includes sudoku and codewords

    Play here

     
     
    The Week recommends

    Jane Austen lives on at these timeless hotels

    It has been more than 200 years since “Emma,” “Pride and Prejudice” and “Sense and Sensibility” were published, yet the words and wit of Jane Austen remain enthralling as ever. And this is a big year for Austen fans. Dec. 16 marks the author's 250th birthday, and boutique hotels on both sides of the Atlantic are celebrating her life and legacy through special programming and events.

    The Queensberry Hotel, Bath, UK
    Austen called Bath home from 1801 to 1806, and the city still celebrates its most famous resident with events like the annual Grand Regency Costumed Promenade through the streets. The Queensberry Hotel, just down the road from the Jane Austen Center, is in the middle of the action. Comprising four Georgian townhouses, the property is “full of personality, without ever laying it on too thick,” said the Michelin Guide.

    One Aldwych, Covent Garden, London
    Covent Garden was one of Austen’s haunts, where she attended the theater and stopped by her brother’s home at 10 Henrietta Street. Around the corner at One Aldwych, guests can learn more about the author’s time in the area through the hotel’s Curators program.

    Deer Path Inn, Lake Forest, Illinois
    Stepping into the Deer Path Inn feels like being “transported back in time to an English countryside estate,” said Travel and Leisure. The Austen Escape package ties in perfectly with the storybook setting and includes an English-themed welcome gift, English breakfast in bed, candlelit dinner with a Regency-inspired menu, and nighttime turndown service with tea and sweets.

    Read more

     
     

    Poll watch

    Over three-quarters of Americans (78%) think elected officials should avoid using aggressive language that could encourage violence, according to a Pew Research Center survey. The poll of 3,554 adults found this includes 83% of Democrats and 75% of Republicans. 

     
     
    INSTANT OPINION

    Today's best commentary

    ‘Why Big Oil is panicking over accountability’
    David Bookbinder at The Hill
    Consumers “shouldn’t have to pay twice for the damage done by multinational oil and gas companies — once through the harm their products cause to our health and our planet and again when those same companies use lawsuits filed by local communities as an excuse to hike prices,” says David Bookbinder. The oil and gas industry “doesn’t like anyone saying plainly that their product causes harm — that they have built a business model on avoiding accountability.”

    ‘The illusion of Western peacemaking’
    Puhiza Shemsedini at Al Jazeera
    It’s “hard to understand how one can tell a group of young women whose family members were displaced, raped, tortured or killed during the war that the problem has to be separated from the people,” says Puhiza Shemsedini. It’s “easy for foreign facilitators to do so because at the end of a peacemaking workshop, they would take a cab to the airport, fly home and leave behind the survivors still struggling with a transition from war to peace.”

    ‘On Israel, Trump should echo Reagan’
    Anik Joshi at The American Conservative
    Trump has to “stand up to the Israeli government” and “should take a lesson on how to do so from none other than President Ronald Reagan.” There was a time when he “held a firm line” against the Israeli government, and there are “lessons aplenty here” for the current administration. It’s “unlikely there will be appreciation in all quarters for this, but ultimately these decisions are to be made by the superior partner in the relationship.”

     
     
    WORD OF THE DAY

    beamforming

    A Wi-Fi feature that helps routers send signals more efficiently, with personal devices broadcasting short, unencrypted reports that external devices can access. But there’s a potential security risk: According to a study from Germany’s Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, these reports can detect where people move through a room by how their bodies disrupt the Wi-Fi field.

     
     

    Evening Review was written and edited by Theara Coleman, Nadia Croes, Catherine Garcia, Elliott Goat, Scott Hocker, Justin Klawans, Joel Mathis, Summer Meza and Devika Rao, with illustrations by Stephen Kelly and Julia Wytrazek.

    Image credits, from top: Illustration by Stephen Kelly / Getty Images / Shutterstock; Illustration by Stephen Kelly / Getty Images; d3sign / Getty Images; Finnbarr Webster / Getty Images
     

    Recent editions

    • Morning Report

      Putin says Russia is ready for war if Europe wants it

    • Evening Review

      Trial by jury: an untouchable right?

    • Morning Report

      OBR chief quits over Budget blunder

    VIEW ALL
    TheWeek
    • About Us
    • Contact Future's experts
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Policy
    • Advertise With Us
    • FAQ
    Add as a preferred source on Google

    The Week UK is part of Future plc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site.

    © Future Publishing Limited Quay House, The Ambury, Bath BA1 1UA. All rights reserved. England and Wales company registration number 2008885.