Seals fired ‘magazines-worth of ammunition’ into Bin Laden’s body
New claims suggest photos of Bin Laden’s body were not released because Navy Seals shot an ‘excessive’ number of rounds into him
PHOTOGRAPHS of Osama bin Laden’s dead body were never released by the US government because the Navy Seals team that carried out the operation fired an “excessive” number of bullets into the al-Qaeda leader, a website has claimed.
The official reason, given by the US government, for not releasing photos of Bin Laden’s body or his burial at sea was that they would provide propaganda for al-Qaeda.
But Sofrep, a website for US special operations forces, believes that it smells a rat. It points out that video was released of the hanging of that other great enemy of the US, Saddam Hussein, as well as photos of his dead sons Uday and Qusay after special forces killed them. So was there actually a different reason for not releasing photos of Bin Laden?
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Sofrep thinks it has the answer. “Two confidential sources within the [special ops] community”, have told them that, during the 2011 raid in Pakistan, “operator after operator took turns dumping magazines-worth of ammunition” into the body of Bin Laden.
“When all was said and done, UBL had over a hundred bullets in him, by the most conservative estimate.”
According to Sofrep, it is legally acceptable for a soldier to shoot a few more rounds into the body of an enemy to ensure they no longer pose a threat. “However, what happened on the Bin Laden raid is beyond excessive. The level of excess shown was not about making sure that Bin Laden was no longer a threat. The excess was pure self-indulgence.”
Sofrep concludes that to have released photographs of the gory remains of Bin Laden would not only have been good propaganda for al-Qaeda, but would have caused an “international scandal” which might have triggered an investigation – and that might have uncovered other operations and activities “which many will do anything to keep buried”.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Home Office worker accused of spiking mistress’s drink with abortion drug
Speed Read Darren Burke had failed to convince his girlfriend to terminate pregnancy
By The Week Staff Published
-
In hock to Moscow: exploring Germany’s woeful energy policy
Speed Read Don’t expect Berlin to wean itself off Russian gas any time soon
By The Week Staff Published
-
Were Covid restrictions dropped too soon?
Speed Read ‘Living with Covid’ is already proving problematic – just look at the travel chaos this week
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Inclusive Britain: a new strategy for tackling racism in the UK
Speed Read Government has revealed action plan setting out 74 steps that ministers will take
By The Week Staff Published
-
Sandy Hook families vs. Remington: a small victory over the gunmakers
Speed Read Last week the families settled a lawsuit for $73m against the manufacturer
By The Week Staff Published
-
Farmers vs. walkers: the battle over ‘Britain’s green and pleasant land’
Speed Read Updated Countryside Code tells farmers: ‘be nice, say hello, share the space’
By The Week Staff Published
-
Motherhood: why are we putting it off?
Speed Read Stats show around 50% of women in England and Wales now don’t have children by 30
By The Week Staff Published
-
Anti-Semitism in America: a case of double standards?
Speed Read Officials were strikingly reluctant to link Texas synagogue attack to anti-Semitism
By The Week Staff Published