The story: Political celebrity Sarah Palin and her daughter Bristol have certainly become their own personal brands, says Suzi Parker at Politics Daily. And now, "these savvy women are taking all the prudent steps a brand holder does to protect an asset" by seeking to license their names as registered trademarks. That would presumably forestall the Tina Feys of the world from making money by impersonating the former Alaska governor. Palin's request, however, has been rejected — for now. The patent office wants more information about how Palin's name has been used for commercial purposes. Another factor working against the Palins: They both failed to sign their names on the application. They have six months to resubmit the paperwork.
The reaction: Trademarking a name may be more common for athletes and entertainers, but politicians can do it too, says lawyer Marshall J. Nelson, as quoted by The Los Angeles Times. And with a few fixes, says Jen Doll at The Village Voice, Palin's application will likely be approved, "meaning the Palins can get back to the good business of just being Americans™." The real lesson here, says Zoe Fox at Time, is that "anyone hoping to profit using Sarah Palin's brand should act quickly, before the 2008 vice presidential nominee finds the 'sign here' line."
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- How Israel's hawks intimidated and silenced the last remnants of the anti-war left
- Why you should stop believing in evolution
- Why China thinks it could defeat the U.S. in battle
- The secret to handling pressure like astronauts, Navy SEALs, and samurai
- Welcome to the age of ambivalent feminism
- What you need to know before you support the police in Ferguson
- The real lesson of Rick Perry's mug shot
- The big policy question libertarians can't answer
- Why your employer should clean your house and do your laundry
- What is Molly? Everything you need to know about the party drug
Subscribe to the Week