Obama's new 'Teddy Roosevelt' populism: Will it help in 2012?
The president tries to find his voice by channeling the progressive politics of an early 20th century GOP president

On Tuesday, President Obama issued a rousing call for a stronger government role in protecting the middle class, and a stinging rebuke of GOP-backed "trickle-down economics." The location of the speech — Osawatomie, Kan. — was no accident. In 1910, Teddy Roosevelt used a famous speech there to demand a "square deal" for average Americans and promote a "New Nationalism" that became the framework for the progressive era. Channeling Teddy and Occupy Wall Street, Obama made a moral and economic case for tackling America's rising wealth disparity. Will emulating TR's populist message help Obama win re-election?
This was an inspired choice: Apparently, Obama is "a Teddy Roosevelt nerd" just like me, says John Avlon at CNN. So surely, "the irony that a Republican president defined the progressive era is not lost" on him. In fact, it's an association Obama is "courting directly in a bid to broaden the appeal of his 2012 agenda beyond partisan lines." Roosevelt is a hero to "Republicans, Democrats, and especially independents," and invoking his ghost lets Obama cleverly "strike populist tones and sound less like a liberal social democrat."
"Why Obama is listening to Teddy Roosevelt for 2012"
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
But Teddy lost: The trouble with the Osawatomie symbolism, at least for Obama, "is that Roosevelt, promoting those ideas, went on to lose his bid to return to the White House in 1912," says Ken Walsh at U.S. News. Instead of leading a progressive revolution, TR went down "amid charges that he was a demagogue who favored a vast over-reach in federal power." That makes this venue choice a "bad omen for Obama."
"Teddy Roosevelt a bad omen for Obama?"
Regardless, this is helping Obama find his voice: Wisely, Obama wasn't directly comparing himself to "one of America's truly great presidents," says John Cassidy at The New Yorker. He merely used Roosevelt's speech as "a convenient framing device" to lay out his own refreshingly "strong and cogent" defense of the middle class, and a devastating critique of today's GOP. Just in time for 2012, Obama "found his voice, or Teddy Roosevelt's voice," and "it was a big improvement."
"Invoking Teddy Roosevelt, Obama finds his voice"
C'mon. This vision is dated — and destructive: Obama has already absurdly claimed the mantles of "Lincoln, FDR, and Reagan," says Michael Knox Beran at National Review. But Teddy Roosevelt is actually pretty apt, since both he and Obama fought for more government. Obama, though, is "out of step with the time." In 1910, "government spending amounted to about 8 percent of GDP." Now it's 40 percent, and "the dead hand of Big Statism is destroying the economies of the West."
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
The genetic secrets of South Korea's female free-divers
Under The Radar Unique physiology of 'real-life mermaid' haenyeo women could help treat chronic diseases
-
Democrats: How to rebuild a damaged brand
Feature Trump's approval rating is sinking, but so is the Democratic brand
-
Unraveling autism
Feature RFK Jr. has vowed to find the root cause of the 'autism epidemic' in months. Scientists have doubts.
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy