The Supreme Court upholds ObamaCare: What it means for you
The blockbuster decision will have a big impact on millions of Americans. Here, a guide to help determine whether you're one of them
It's too early to gauge the political fallout from the Supreme Court's split decision Thursday to uphold President Obama's health-care law. But the ruling will have clear — and, in some cases, immediate — consequences for millions of Americans, from the uninsured to the poor to small business owners. Here, a brief guide to how the landmark 5-4 decision could affect you:
Who will feel the biggest impact?
The "mammoth law" affects just about everybody, says Mark Trumbull at The Christian Science Monitor, but "the court's ruling has the biggest implications" for the roughly 50 million Americans who are uninsured. Many people have been unable to get coverage because of pre-existing conditions, and ObamaCare bars insurance companies from denying such consumers. Other Americans don't have insurance because they can't afford it. Under ObamaCare, the federal government will offer subsidies for those who need help obtaining coverage. For example, in 2014, a family of four making $60,000, with no employer-provided insurance, could get $9,308 toward their $14,245 in premiums. (Several online calculators can help you estimate what you might pay.)
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What happens to people who refuse to buy coverage?
They'll have to pay a penalty — or, as the Supreme Court majority sees it, a tax. Although there are some exemptions, as a general rule, the penalty will be $285 per family or 1 percent of income, whichever is greater, starting in 2014. By 2016, the penalty will rise to $2,085 per family or 2.5 percent of income, whichever is greater.
Will poor people have to pay penalties, too?
Not necessarily. The law includes a provision that expands the Medicaid program, providing care for everyone under age 65 with income that doesn't exceed 133 percent of the federal poverty line (about $30,000 for a family of four). In theory, that would add 16 million Americans to the program. But thanks to the Supreme Court, there's a catch.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
What's the catch?
The health-care law sought to force states to go along with the expansion by withholding federal Medicaid money to any state that refused to comply. But the court ruled that the federal government could only withhold new funding from those states, and not strip them of the Medicaid money they're getting already. This leaves open the possibility of states refusing to go along with the Medicaid expansion, potentially forcing many low-income Americans to obtain insurance on their own, or pay a fine.
What about people who already have insurance?
They'll be affected, too. A host of provisions affecting their coverage will remain in force. For example, children can stay on parents' plans until they're 26; insurers can't limit lifetime benefits; companies won't be able to deny new coverage due to pre-existing conditions; and insurance customers will be able to get preventive care with no out-of-pocket charges (including free birth control, provided you don't work for a faith-based organization that opposes it).
Anyone else?
Yes. Small-business owners with fewer than 25 employees and average annual wages under $50,000 will get tax credits for offering their employees coverage.
Sources: CBS News, Christian Science Monitor, CNN, Kaiser Family Foundation, Mother Jones, New York Times (2), Slate, Washington Post
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
-
'The House under GOP rule has become a hostile workplace'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
The Shohei Ohtani gambling scandal is about more than bad bets
In The Spotlight The firestorm surrounding one of baseball's biggest stars threatens to upend a generational legacy and professional sports at large
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Feds raid Diddy homes in alleged sex trafficking case
Speed Read Homeland Security raided the properties of hip hop mogul Sean "Diddy" Combs
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Xi-Biden meeting: what's in it for both leaders?
Today's Big Question Two superpowers seek to stabilise relations amid global turmoil but core issues of security, trade and Taiwan remain
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Will North Korea take advantage of Israel-Hamas conflict?
Today's Big Question Pyongyang's ties with Russia are 'growing and dangerous' amid reports it sent weapons to Gaza
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published